Forum Login

Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS Flare Issue

Canon 5D with 24-105mm F/4L IS @ F/16

Photograph Courtesy Bob Kulon

In early October '05 Canon started shipping the EF 24-105mm f/4L IS lens. I had tested a pre-production sample and found it to be not only excellent optically but also a most convenient and usable lens, especially for street shooting. Two early purchasers that write for this site published reviews of the lens – one by Mark Segal and the other by Bill Caulfield-Browne.

I purchased a 24-105mm for myself as soon as it became available, and took it with me on a two week shoot in China later that month. I took a couple of thousand frames with it, both on the 5D and the 1Ds MKII, and I have nothing but good things to say about it.

But, as soon as I returned from China in late October I read that Canon USA had announced that there was a problem with early production lenses, and that these early lenses were being recalled for repair. You can find out more about this recall notice on the Canon USA web site.

The curious thing though is that three other members of my China expedition were also using the 24-105mm, and none of us had experienced this flare problem. I have subsequently spoken with at least a half dozen other people who own early samples of this lens (Canon stopped shipping them once the problem was discovered, and has recalled inventory from dealers), and none have seen a flare problem either.

But then on Nov 6, Bob Kulon was one of the members of my Brickworks Workshop in Toronto, and he was using the 24-105mm on the shoot. He saw a serious flare problem on a number of his frames, and one of these is shown above. It is the green semi-circle in the upper-right of frame. The white light on the left of frame is a sunbeam coming through the roof of the abandoned factory.

Most interestingly, on Canon's web site they state, "The flare is most obvious in the wide zoom and wide aperture settings," yet Bob's photograph was taken at a focal length of 70mm, and an aperture of f/16.


It's Real

So. The problem is real after all, and is not simply due to an over-abundance of caution on Canon's part.

If you own one of these lenses with an effected control and serial number, as shown on Canon's information page, then you really should send the lens in for repair. To my knowledge this repair program is in effect in both the US and Canada. Elsewhere you'll have to contact your local Canon agent or representatives, or the retailer that you purchased the lens from.

As to the actual nature of the repair, that remains a mystery, and is not mentioned on the Canon web site. Since the repairs will only start after Nov 14, I would assume that some parts are required.

I have to say that it would be reassuring if Canon would explain the nature of the repair. If it's simply the replacement of a missing baffle, or some black flocking, that's one thing. If it means optical disassembly, it's another. Several readers have indicated concern at having their expensive precision lens worked on outside of the factory environment.

I intend on having my lens repaired by Canon Canada. If and as I find out more I'll let you know.


Filed Under:  

show page metadata

Concepts: Optics, F-number, Photographic lens, Focal length, Focus, Lens, Depth of field, Telephoto lens

Entities: Toronto, Canon, Canon Canada, China, US, Canada, Michael Reichmann, Bob Kulon, Bill Caulfield-Browne, Mark Segal, Bob

Tags: flare problem, repair, web site, Canon USA, local canon agent, Canon USA web, expensive precision lens, Canon web site, early production lenses, wide aperture settings, usable lens, Canon Canada, China, 1ds mkii, early purchasers, Bill Caulfield-Browne, Mark Segal, street shooting, green semi-circle, pre-production sample, early lenses, recall notice, good things, half dozen, late october, curious thing, black flocking, Bob Kulon, repair program, Several readers, effected control, white light, optical disassembly, focal length, China expedition, serial number, actual nature, wide zoom, factory environment, information page