Forum Login

 

Stop It — Down!

The F Stops Here

The title is a bad pun, I know, but I couldn't help it. (My second choice pun is found in the subtitle).

There has been a recent discussion (July, 2002) on the Discussion Forum that evolved into one about the resolution of lenses; wide open Vs. stopped down.; aerial image Vs. image resolution on film, etc, etc. While this is of interest, it raises the practical concern that all photographers have about using their lenses at optimum aperture Vs. stopped down.

Most photographers know that lenses typically perform at their best about 2 stops down from wide open. This is usually at f/5.6 or f/8 (depending on the maximum aperture of the lens). Using the lens either wide open or stopped all the way down can lead to increased aberration, diffraction effects or facial warts. Somewhere in the middle is best. Right?

We all believe this, myself included, because it's mostly true (except the part about the warts — I made that up). But is it relevant?!

Chained Hut — Iceland, June 2002

Photographed with a Pentax 67II and 55-100mm f/4.5 zoom on Provia 100F

On a recent trip to Iceland I photographed this sod-covered hut using my Pentax 67's 55-100mm f/4.5 zoom, shooting at 55mm. I wanted to hold depth of field from the foreground flowers out to the distant cliffs. This meant shooting stopped down all the way to f/32.

I was soaking wet (even my Gortex-treated boots, from walking in rain-soaked grass for 20 minutes), and simply wanted to get back to the truck to put on dry gear. As I set up the shot it crossed my mind though that the sharpness that this image demanded would be compromised by my stopping the lens down all the way.

My next thought was, "You're soaking wet. Your feet are freezing. Don't be a jerk. Stop worrying and take the damn shot."

The Proof Print Is In The Pudding

You can view a larger version of the full image above by clicking on it, but have a look at the enlargement below. This is an equivalent enlargement to a print several feet in width.

Is this shot sharp enough for almost any purpose? Yes!

Would it have been even sharper if I'd shot at f8 or f/11. Yes, probably.

Does it matter? No, not in the slightest.

Stop worrying! Take Pictures!

Enough said.


Filed Under:  
Essays   

show page metadata

Concepts: Photography, Lens, Optics, Stop consonant, Aperture, Image, F-number, Camera

Entities: Pentax, Iceland, Michael Reichmann

Tags: image, optimum aperture vs, aerial image vs, wide open vs, choice pun, bad pun, maximum aperture, Most photographers, equivalent enlargement, damn shot, distant cliffs, foreground flowers, facial warts, June 2002, practical concern, sod-covered hut, larger version, diffraction effects, image resolution, recent discussion, rain-soaked grass, dry gear, Discussion Forum, Gortex-treated boots, recent trip, worrying, Pentax, zoom, sharpness, sharper, freezing, Provia, 100F, minutes