Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 [10]
 91 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:09:19 PM 
Started by PhotoEcosse - Last post by JonathanRimmel
The K3 is the closest thing to a D400 now. Though there is this ember of hope, the rumored D9300.

 92 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:09:19 PM 
Started by Audican - Last post by prh555
do you have the box, hood etc?

Prh

 93 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:07:37 PM 
Started by John V. - Last post by BrianWJH
Not sure what to make of it... Any input?

Most other posters seem to be using the Rosco Clear Gloss & Flat Acrylic Glazes.

Here are some other posts on using the Rosco Clear Gloss & Flat Acrylic Glazes products:

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=56339.0

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=76836.0

http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=68944.0

Brian.

 94 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:05:43 PM 
Started by PeterAit - Last post by Jim Kasson
https://www.modernpostcard.com/about/terms-conditions
Gang-run service. in one sentence they guarantee 85-90% accuracy, in the next sentence, they accept no responsibility for color. They gave you the profile, but that's really about it.

Lawyers! Don't confuse the weasel-words with what 's really going on.

If you have your process under control, there's nothing wrong with "gang-run". It just means that everybody gets the same {hopefully time-invariant) process. The "neighboring image ink requirements" phrase is worrisome, and implies that they might tweak the process dependent on what else is going on on the web. 

I've never seen any enforceable guarantees from a printer. Either you accept the results or you're into a negotiation.

That said, this thread is not about the T's&C's; it's about where you -- if you're a printer -- want your relationship with your customer's file to start. With a generic file, or one that's got a chance of being optimized for your printer?

Jim

 95 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:05:05 PM 
Started by tim wolcott - Last post by cjogo
Point & Shoot quick shot at the pond  &  a early 70's shot of Yosemite trees ...

 96 
 on: April 19, 2014, 08:02:59 PM 
Started by Dinarius - Last post by Chris_Brown
The full application is available only on the disks supplied with each new DSLR camera. If the application has been installed from this source, then the updates on Canon's site will install & work correctly.

 97 
 on: April 19, 2014, 07:22:27 PM 
Started by Chris Kern - Last post by Chris Kern
Kevin Raber's photograph on today's start page makes me green (and orange and red) with envy.

I don't know whether you're willing to disclose your trade secrets, Kevin, but I'm wondering whether you tweaked the background colors in post.  And if so, with what software.  And if you did, how you managed to preserve the boy's skintones.

It really is a striking image.

 98 
 on: April 19, 2014, 06:55:01 PM 
Started by PeterAit - Last post by Chris233
It's a good example. They offer the profile, fair prices, and a lot of good literature to educate their customers how to use it. I'm sure their color control is spot on, also. They print on one device, mostly one stock, and one inkset, which is simple to provide. Most big shops have multiple devices, several stocks, and product offerings, which compounds the whole thing to support.

https://www.modernpostcard.com/about/terms-conditions
Gang-run service. in one sentence they guarantee 85-90% accuracy, in the next sentence, they accept no responsibility for color. They gave you the profile, but that's really about it.

 99 
 on: April 19, 2014, 06:50:16 PM 
Started by tim wolcott - Last post by muntanela
Spring in the chestnut groves of Tiolo and along the old mule track from Tiolo to Vedait (Valtelline Valley)

 100 
 on: April 19, 2014, 06:41:40 PM 
Started by bgphoto - Last post by digitaldog
Just curious about modifying the lighting option in i1 Profiler. The default setting is for d50 lighting so when you change that setting to d65 the graph shifts to a predominately cooler side. If you were to create a profile for d65 illumination and then display the print in an environment with d50 illumination, would the print display cooler than if it were shown in d65 lighting?
That's the general idea. How close that comes to the reality of those two different aim points I can't say. It's been a long time since I measured a custom illuminant and used it in the product but visually, there was a subtle difference. I recall doing this for a Fluorescent booth which was supposed to be "D50" so I didn't expect to see a lot of color difference anyway.

Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 [10]
Ad
Ad
Ad