Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: More questions on MLU  (Read 1923 times)
Saulius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


WWW
« on: February 13, 2006, 08:24:22 AM »
ReplyReply

Hi everyone. I am new at this site. I am amateur photograper. My passion is nature photography. I own Nikon F75. This is maximum that I can afford to myself at the moment and in near future have no possibility for better camera. I Have read on this site about MLU. Unfortunately, my camera, has not that "option".
My question is:
1. can I expect to fix sharpeness of a picture in Photoshop if there is no way to lock the mirrow in my camera?
2. If I`d tackle hard my camera to a heavy tripod would it help? Or should I think about different camera anyway?

Any coments, please...

Thanks

Saulius
Logged
Tim Gray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2002



WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2006, 09:16:48 AM »
ReplyReply

Actually, MLU is most appropriate for a fairly narrow range of shutter speeds - roughly .25 sec to 1 sec.  Faster or slower than that and the vibration induced by the mirror bounce is not much of an impact.    

My advice is go with what you can afford and use a remote release, or if your camera can do a delay, use that.  At the speeds where MLU is effective, the other major contributer (IMHO even more of a problem than mirror slap) is the vibration induced by pressing the shutter, a delay or cable release will deal with that.
Logged
Saulius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2006, 01:51:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks Tim

I do use remote in my steady shots. I like shoting in conditions of long exposure. So mirror vibration is actual to me. (I always wondered why my pics are not as sharp as I want them to be. Now I realised.) Anyway, for this time I will use equipment that I have and will correct sharpness in Photoshop. (A little disapointed, though, about Nikon because of lack of MLU).

Thanks again.
Logged
Saulius
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 44


WWW
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2006, 02:00:06 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Tim Gray,Feb 13 2006, 06:16 PM
Actually, MLU is most appropriate for a fairly narrow range of shutter speeds - roughly .25 sec to 1 sec.  Faster or slower than that and the vibration induced by the mirror bounce is not much of an impact.    

Wait, do you mean, taht if I`m shoting at slower  then 25 sec. speed, then mirror vibration is not that important? That sounds prommising.

Saulius
Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6429


« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2006, 02:44:08 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
   
Quote
Actually, MLU is most appropriate for a fairly narrow range of shutter speeds - roughly .25 sec to 1 sec.  Faster or slower than that and the vibration induced by the mirror bounce is not much of an impact.   

Wait, do you mean, taht if I`m shoting at slower  then 25 sec. speed, then mirror vibration is not that important? That sounds prommising.

Saulius

Jus to be sure you understood what Tim said: it's between 1/4 second (not 25 sec) and 1 second  
« Last Edit: February 14, 2006, 02:44:37 AM by francois » Logged

Francois
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad