Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: ZD test in CDI  (Read 3957 times)
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8348



WWW
« on: March 16, 2006, 07:06:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Chasseur d'Image has tested the ZD in their April issue.

Their main conclusions are:

+++

- the quality of the RAW images is very high, with surprisingly more detail compared to a 1dsII shot (their sample is the facade of a gothic church in flat light),
- the viewfinder is very good, although there is slight warm cast to it,
- the camera is very easy to use for someone coming from the DSLR world,

---

- the quality of the jpg images is really poor,
- the Mamiya RAW converter software isn't ready for prime time, although some of the features (like distorsion correction) have good potential,
- the LCD screen is a disaster.

Regards,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Wim van Velzen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 355



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2006, 02:28:28 AM »
ReplyReply

Thanks Bernard,

Anything about the higher ISOs?
Logged

I don't have a signature.
francois
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 6944


« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2006, 03:40:23 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Thanks Bernard,

Anything about the higher ISOs?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=60493\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
CDI reports that  noise level at ISO 50 is remarkable but very noticeable from ISO 100 and up. Noise at ISO 100 is not far away from the noise level of the Nikon D200 at ISO 800.
FWIW, Réponse Photo (another french mag) seems to agree with CDI on noise.
« Last Edit: March 17, 2006, 03:41:17 AM by francois » Logged

Francois
Paul Jameson
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 14


« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2006, 08:57:05 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm excited to see the results! Perhaps this will be the revolution that Mamiya was hoping for.

I don't particularly want to shoot jpg's anyway.

Thanks for the info Bernard.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2006, 08:57:49 AM by Paul Jameson » Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad