Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Canon MF coming?  (Read 86269 times)
BJNY
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1112


« Reply #60 on: May 26, 2006, 12:02:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Deleted
« Last Edit: April 06, 2008, 11:55:22 AM by BJNY » Logged

Guillermo
DiaAzul
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 777



WWW
« Reply #61 on: May 26, 2006, 12:54:17 PM »
ReplyReply

The football world cup is starting in a couple of weeks, so we should be able to put an end to this debate.

Keep your eyes on the touchline instead of the game and secrets may be revealed. If no details, then at least there will be plenty of stories on the internet of what people thought they saw, or claim that they have been told.

By the way, my prediction is England will go out in the semi-finals on penalties (again).
Logged

David Plummer    http://photo.tanzo.org/
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8200



WWW
« Reply #62 on: May 26, 2006, 06:29:10 PM »
ReplyReply

BJL,

It seems that Devils can't win... I agree with most of your points, except for the firs one perhaps.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
MikeFizer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3


« Reply #63 on: May 29, 2006, 07:47:42 AM »
ReplyReply

Forget about pixel and formats, the best thing Canon could do to match their MF big brothers is to go to 16bit captures and fix the wide angle dilemma.
Logged

Josef Isayo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #64 on: May 30, 2006, 05:31:09 PM »
ReplyReply

A 22MP, 16 bit sensor in a smaller body with one ultra high end wide angle lens will do the trick for me. Do we really need more?


Josef
Logged

BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8200



WWW
« Reply #65 on: May 30, 2006, 06:15:05 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
A 22MP, 16 bit sensor in a smaller body with one ultra high end wide angle lens will do the trick for me. Do we really need more?
Josef
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=66941\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

My very feeling as well. I might even consider switching then.

Regards,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Tim Gray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2002



WWW
« Reply #66 on: May 30, 2006, 06:32:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
A 22MP, 16 bit sensor in a smaller body with one ultra high end wide angle lens will do the trick for me. Do we really need more?
Josef
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=66941\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

which ultra high end wide angles have caught your attention?  I've been taking a look at the Zeiss 21mm Distagon and the Leica 18mm Elmarit, any others?
Logged
RolandBaker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 40


WWW
« Reply #67 on: May 30, 2006, 08:11:09 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
which ultra high end wide angles have caught your attention?  I've been taking a look at the Zeiss 21mm Distagon and the Leica 18mm Elmarit, any others?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=66949\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

It's the Leica 19mm you want not the 18mm.

The Zeiss 21 is king for sharpness edge-to-edge. The Leica 19 is close but not quite as good on the edges but with a little better color but you have to break your mirror to use it on a FF Canon. The Zeiss can fit as is. I own both.

The Leica 28 is possibly the sharpest lens ever made in this range. The Zeiss 28/2.0 (not 2.Cool is very close and the Zeiss 35 PC Shift lenses are amazing. I own these too.

The Leica 15/2.8 is the best in its class. I don't own that one, I own the lessor Leica 15/3.5 which is basically the same design as the Zeiss 15/3.5 with possibly different coatings. These aren't as good but they are a good value and more common on the used market.
Logged

Best regards,

Roland
Black Ricco
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« Reply #68 on: May 30, 2006, 09:50:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
On point 1, I believe that Canon was already number 1 by the end of the era of FSLRs (Film based SLR's)...

I totally agree. Nikon peaked with their F2AS Photomic. The lead changed when Nikon released that piece of crap F3 at around the same time Canon released the improved, built like a tank, F1n with rotatable high point finder. It was the best camera I ever owned. Give me all the features of that F1 with a 20mp capability and I wouldn't need a girlfriend.

Logged
Gregory
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 191


WWW
« Reply #69 on: June 14, 2006, 12:29:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Now we just need 4:3 aspect ratio!
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=65129\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

yuk! you were being sarcastic, right?

give me 3:2 or 16:9 but not 4:3.
Logged

Gregory's Blog: An Aussie in HK
Equipment: Canon EOS 1D Mark III, 17-40L, 24-105L, 70-300 DO
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad