Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Phase One P20 question  (Read 2677 times)
padey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 31


WWW
« on: September 12, 2006, 04:39:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Does anyone here have some experience with this back.

I'm wondering if the ISO 800 images are usable/to noise in anything printed at or below 16x20'?

And is it worth 3 times the coin for a similar Kodak DCS Pro?

cheers,

Andrew
Logged

[span style='color:blue']
Andrew

www.catoandpade.com.au[/span]
pss
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 960


WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2006, 06:35:48 PM »
ReplyReply

i have a P20...the 800 is pixel binning..so you only get half the file size....i haven't tried it but i have shot with 400 and like it..it definitely has a grainy look...can't compare to canons (maybe at 1600) but it has a similar film like grainy look...for clean files 200 is max...i don't like to use noise removal software, i always feel it gives everything a very artificial digital watercolor look....i would rrather have grain..like canon at 1600/3200 or P20 at 400....hmm maybe i should try the 800?

not sure which system you have, but the P20 with a rollei 6008af and 80mmPQS is about 10000$...new with warranty...maybe even less after photokina...
it is a great back, easily beats anything DSLR (i also have a 1DsmkII..not even close)...and i am assuming also the kodak which is really only 14bit....plus the P20 shoots about 40-45frames/minute tethered or to CF card...
i really can't compare to the kodak because i have never seen files from it...the only comparisons are on this site and it looks very close to the canon...
i used to have the 14n and if the software is anything like that...
phase simply has it figured out how to get the most out of these chips...
Logged

mikeseb
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 482



WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 13, 2006, 08:32:07 AM »
ReplyReply

I have the Kodak ProBack on a Contax 645. I looked at the option of the P20 but decided the price differential at the time didn't make sense for my situation. Don't know what P20's are going for these days; depending on which mount you wanted it for, the ProBacks were selling on eBay for around $4500-5000 back in the spring when I picked mine up--and more for the Contax mount (mine), naturally,  perhaps because there were fewer of those on offer. I've tracked every ProBack sold on eBay for the last year so I feel confident about those price ranges. There have been no Contax backs on sale there, to my knowledge, for about four months, and slightly more Mamiya than H'blad models.

I find the ProBack's images to be spectacular at ISO 100, good at 200, and pretty noisy at 400 especially for images in lower light levels. I use NeatImage and have found settings that strike a proper balance between noise reduction and important-image-detail reduction! I pretty much stay at ISO 100, and that works fine for me.

I have used it in studio-like settings, where it really excels; as well as on location, where it can be a bit clunky to use but still does the job. I love it for portraiture, architecture, and landscape/cityscape work. I was even dumb enough to take it to an extreme skate park mounted on my Contax 645 with a bazooka-like 350mm lens out front for some action shooting! Not its forte, as it doesn't like to shoot rapidly and it can actually overheat in such settings, but I got some decent images (check my website if interested.)  The contax AF is as much a limitation in such situations as is the ProBack; in fairness, not what it was designed for, so I was back to the old manual-focus days.

I'm overall satisfied with the ProBack on the Contax. Would I rather have had a P25 or P45--absolutely. But I was not willing to pay the difference for the P20 over the ProBack.
Logged

michael sebastian
Website  |  Blog
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad