That is what I'm asking myself, I'm thinking to have everything in one program may be good. There is no comparison to C1 Pro for conversions with these backs in my opinion. I just opened up a P30 raw image in LR and it was 2 stops underexposed. Opened it in C1 Pro and it was perfectly exposed??? IF it's not one thing it is another.
Ben
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=101440\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
there is a thread about the 2 stops in the MF forum....this does not happen to me....i have been using C1 for years, but LR really makes thing easier...conversions are just as good as well (if it wasn't for the missing 15% ....C1 V4 will be out soon and i am sure it will be even better then the current version...but i doubt it will have even close to as many functions....