I first tried Lightroom last year. I found it slow on my 1Gb Latitude notebook which I have now uograded to 2 Mb pending Dell releasing D830 Latitude with Santa Rosa processor next month. Hopefully I will now find Lightroom more useable.
Everyone seems to rave about it but I have got used to Bridge (now runing CS3 beta with latest ACR.)
I cannot get my head around whether I should be looking at dumping Bridge or not. I do not see how I can since I use it for Illustrator and InDesign files, although photo files represent 95% of my useage. My (limited) understanding is that Bridge and Lightroom each generate their own thumbnail files which are not compatible so if I use both programmes I will have two sets of thumbnails which sounds extravagent re disk space. Also, what about key words etc, do I have to enter everything twice?
Also, when first trying I found that if I opened a pic in PS then saved it as a .psd, I had to manually import it into the library before Lightroom would find it. I prefer the Bridge system of always displaying anything. I am now told that you can set folders for watching but I want all my picture folders and 3 drives watched. Is this resurce hungry and so will slow things down?
I have already invested a fair bit of time in Lightroom a few months back and concluded that it was not for me - Bridge was better. Now everyone seems to be raving about Lightroom, perhaps I reached the wrong decision. Could anyone please comment?
PS new web site, trying to get my hits up! www.duncangrove.com
for pics of Wimbledon tennis, S of France and others. Please visit and e-mail feedback!