Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: New Image Thread  (Read 12849 times)
eronald
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 3873



WWW
« on: March 30, 2007, 03:38:56 AM »
ReplyReply

Time to post latest/greatest/favest encountered on the net, again.

Here is my contribution.

http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.ht...240&i_id=575079


Edmund
Logged

Edmund Ronald, Ph.D. 
Graham Mitchell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2282



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2007, 04:00:37 AM »
ReplyReply

Maybe we should restrict images to those taken with medium format digital in this forum. Those images are from Canon DSLR.
Logged

Graham Mitchell - www.graham-mitchell.com
rainer_v
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1128


WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2007, 05:04:08 AM »
ReplyReply

i cannot see the sense of this link here....
Logged

rainer viertlböck
architecture photographer
munich / germany

www.tangential.de
Dustbak
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2359


« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2007, 06:43:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Maybe we should restrict images to those taken with medium format digital in this forum. Those images are from Canon DSLR.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109578\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 06:44:30 AM by Dustbak » Logged
61Dynamic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1442


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2007, 12:32:48 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Actually it was taken with Canon's Tilt-shift lens. These images were featured at Rob Galbraith's recently.

[a href=\"http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_page.asp?cid=7-8737-8912]http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_p...cid=7-8737-8912[/url]
Logged
Dustbak
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2359


« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2007, 12:42:43 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Actually it was taken with Canon's Tilt-shift lens. These images were featured at Rob Galbraith's recently.

http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/content_p...cid=7-8737-8912
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109682\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Sorry but that image I find very hard to belief it was taken with a TS lens or at least that the specific effect is because of using the TS lens. I am cracking my brains to think of a tilt setting that can get the image in focus front to back but not right next to that or at places that are at the same distance.

I can see it is an IR image.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2007, 12:47:25 PM by Dustbak » Logged
godtfred
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293



WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2007, 01:37:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Time to post latest/greatest/favest encountered on the net, again.

Here is my contribution.

http://www.sportsshooter.com/port_popup.ht...240&i_id=575079
Edmund
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Love the photographs, dont care whether its TS lens or PS creativity...

My turn, not medium format, and strictly not only photography, (its a flash site, so you have to click "miscellaneous, and its the picture thats number three from the bottom on the right hand column, also the one number three from the top is good.)

[a href=\"http://www.martinengh.com/]http://www.martinengh.com/[/url]
Logged

Axel Bauer
godtfred.com
H2|M679CS|P45+
Dustbak
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2359


« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2007, 02:14:54 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Love the photographs, dont care whether its TS lens or PS creativity...

My turn, not medium format, and strictly not only photography, (its a flash site, so you have to click "miscellaneous, and its the picture thats number three from the bottom on the right hand column, also the one number three from the top is good.)

http://www.martinengh.com/
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109694\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


You are right imagewise it doesn't matter how it has been taken.

After looking at it several times and longer I must say it is a very appealing image. I just wished the plane of focus would be a tiny bit more to the right.
Logged
howiesmith
Guest
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2007, 05:14:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Sorry but that image I find very hard to belief it was taken with a TS lens or at least that the specific effect is because of using the TS lens. I am cracking my brains to think of a tilt setting that can get the image in focus front to back but not right next to that or at places that are at the same distance.

I can see it is an IR image.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109687\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Could I suggest it is rotated 90 degrees and then "tilted."  Same as swing on LF.
Logged
David Anderson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 422



WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2007, 06:06:53 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Not only that but the masked blur is so obvious and just a bit too much to the left the photographer should be ashamed.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109597\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

All that he's done is fairly easy with the tilt lenses, you can rotate them ..



Logged

godtfred
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 293



WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 30, 2007, 06:30:23 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Could I suggest it is rotated 90 degrees and then "tilted."  Same as swing on LF.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109741\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


To me it seems like the plane of focus almost stretches directly from the lens and into the picture, and not on an axis from somewhere on the right to somewhere on the left or vice versa, like a TS lens normally would give. Id give my vote to PS...

The canon lenses can be rotated, so no prob. there, but still... just seems too much for them (i use the 24 and 45 ofthen, and would not be able to reproduce the effect I see here, maybe on my linhof, but i have not tried   )
Logged

Axel Bauer
godtfred.com
H2|M679CS|P45+
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad