Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Small Error in iPF5000 Report  (Read 969 times)
John Hollenberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 770


« on: March 30, 2007, 05:45:47 PM »
ReplyReply

I discovered a small error in the iPF5000 Report Card Section.  The category of "Service" received a grade of "F".  The correct category should have read "Timeliness of Service".  With the one exception mentioned in the article, every problem reported to the Wiki has eventually been resolved favorably.  The general consensus has been that the service techs are skilled and conscientious.

In retrospect, it probably would have been better to have separate categories:

Quality of service - B+
Timeliness of Service - F

The quality of service would be downgraded slightly for problems such as:

1) A poster whose roll feed was incorrectly reassembled, with one of the gears left out so that it didn't function properly.  He had to consult the Wiki and point out the problem to the service tech on an additional service call.

2) Poster who reported roll feed malfunction. Tech showed up (with none of the re-designed parts pre-ordered), then had to make a second service call.

These are occasional and relatively minor annoyances which wouldn't affect the quality of service rating much.  

My apologies for this oversight.

--John
Logged
John Hollenberg
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 770


« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2007, 06:08:34 PM »
ReplyReply

With lightning speed, Michael Reichmann has now modified the report card to break service down into the two entries described in the previous post.

--John
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad