Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: New panos from old images  (Read 4438 times)
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« on: April 17, 2007, 09:33:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Dear all,

I could finally find time to put together 2 panos shot in China last year:




Regards,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7910



WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2007, 10:28:35 AM »
ReplyReply

Breathtaking, Bernard!

I keep reading about all the fuss and gyrations that people go through to make panos, and I say to myself "Not worth the trouble." And then you show some of yours, and my appetite is whetted again.

Beautiful, as always.

Best,

Eric
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
francois
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 6803


« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2007, 11:37:32 AM »
ReplyReply

Hi Bernard,
Both are stunning but I like the vertical a lot - it's quite uncommon to see vertical panos.
« Last Edit: April 17, 2007, 11:37:49 AM by francois » Logged

Francois
MikeMike
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 145


WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2007, 12:31:13 PM »
ReplyReply

The second one is definitively my favorite, I Find the vertical pano very original.
Logged
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5727



WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2007, 02:54:59 PM »
ReplyReply

Beautiful work, as always.

Thanks!
Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2007, 05:33:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks a lot gentlemen.

Yep, panos are a pain to shoot, but the results can be nice.

cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Ray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8878


« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2007, 06:12:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Bernard,
Lovely, clear shots taken at the right time of day for beautiful lighting. However, you'd need a big wall to hang such prints of a sufficiently large size to fully appreciate the fine detail. Are you selling prints like these?

The horizontal pano looks as though it's comprised of 5 or 6 images with camera vertical, or maybe 2 or 3 images with camera horizontal. Which?

Were there any problems stitching these or did the fully automatic modes of PTGui handle it easily?

Now I've seen what a perfect job can be done by programs such as Autopano and CS3 Photomerge with 3 or 4 images (sometimes, anyway), I intend experimenting more with handheld shots to get an idea of what sort of images can be automatically stitched. Having to set up a tripod, assuming one is carrying a tripod, can be a pain. Lightweight ballheads don't seem useful in my experience.
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2007, 06:30:51 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Bernard,
Lovely, clear shots taken at the right time of day for beautiful lighting. However, you'd need a big wall to hang such prints of a sufficiently large size to fully appreciate the fine detail. Are you selling prints like these?

The horizontal pano looks as though it's comprised of 5 or 6 images with camera vertical, or maybe 2 or 3 images with camera horizontal. Which?

Were there any problems stitching these or did the fully automatic modes of PTGui handle it easily?

Now I've seen what a perfect job can be done by programs such as Autopano and CS3 Photomerge with 3 or 4 images (sometimes, anyway), I intend experimenting more with handheld shots to get an idea of what sort of images can be automatically stitched. Having to set up a tripod, assuming one is carrying a tripod, can be a pain. Lightweight ballheads don't seem useful in my experience.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=112955\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Ray,

Some answers for you:

- horizontal pano is 7 shots, vertical is 4 shots + extra images for DR,
- PTgui could handle these in fully automated mode with an average error or .4 pixel after getting rid of a few stray points.

There were some problems with the first pano resulting from the fact that the original sequence of images couldn't be used. The second image was blurred for some reason. I had to bring in another one from a different sequence, which made things a bit more complex to have a seamless stitch in the sky. PTgui isn't at fault though, I am the culprit,
- this was shot with an RRS ultimate Pro pano package on top of an RRS BH-40 ball head on top of Markins base on top of a Gitzo 1257 carbon tripod.

The RRS stuff works perfect for light lenses on the D2x, but is lacking rigidity for when using the 70-200 f2.8, which - together with pretty strong winds - caused the problem described above.

Regards,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Ray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8878


« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2007, 06:59:47 PM »
ReplyReply

I take it, Bernard, that you do not have the beta version of CS3 to experiment with?
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2007, 07:20:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I take it, Bernard, that you do not have the beta version of CS3 to experiment with?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=112961\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Ray,

I have downloaded it, but never actually bothered installing it.

Honnestly, PTgui meets my needs perfectly, pano software is clearly not the area of my workflow where I intend to spend time these days. Sorry about that.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Phuong
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 113


« Reply #10 on: April 17, 2007, 08:53:55 PM »
ReplyReply

one question about lens use.
did you shot the vertical pano with the 70-200/f.8?
and given the strong wind and lack of rigidity that you described, would it help to turn VR on?
« Last Edit: April 17, 2007, 08:57:53 PM by Phuong » Logged
shothunter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 17, 2007, 10:57:15 PM »
ReplyReply

Just WOW - thanks for sharing!
eddie
Logged

"I never bracket (...), bracketing is a sign of insecurity, (...) it means you don't really know what you're doing..."
Ansel Adams, 1983 BBC Series
picnic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 574


« Reply #12 on: April 18, 2007, 08:12:15 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Just WOW - thanks for sharing!
eddie
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=112987\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Both are lovely, but the second (vertical) is my favorite.  The light and shadow just pull you into the image.

Diane
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 18, 2007, 08:51:05 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Both are lovely, but the second (vertical) is my favorite.  The light and shadow just pull you into the image.

Diane
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=113046\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Thanks a lot Diane.

Regards,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Chris_T
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 541


« Reply #14 on: April 19, 2007, 07:46:26 AM »
ReplyReply

While both are nice images, I definitely prefer the vertical one. Aside from vertical panos being less commom (know only one local photog specializing in that), the few trees in the foreground really make shots of this kind (vertical or horizontal). They stand out against darker foliage and rocks, and add scale and depth. Scattered along the bottom, these trees add anchor points at the right, center and left, and balance out the more prominent ridge running in the middle and the snowy peak at the top right. I think I'm saying that I really like the composition.

I won't worry about needing space to hang panos. These days, many in the US are tearing down their perfectly fine homes and replacing them with huge mansions. Come to think of it, can it be that they have panos to hang?
Logged
BernardLanguillier
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7903



WWW
« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2007, 11:24:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
While both are nice images, I definitely prefer the vertical one. Aside from vertical panos being less commom (know only one local photog specializing in that), the few trees in the foreground really make shots of this kind (vertical or horizontal). They stand out against darker foliage and rocks, and add scale and depth. Scattered along the bottom, these trees add anchor points at the right, center and left, and balance out the more prominent ridge running in the middle and the snowy peak at the top right. I think I'm saying that I really like the composition.

[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=113230\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Thanks a lot Chris.

Cheers,
Bernard
Logged

A few images online here!
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad