Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: sigma lens  (Read 3247 times)
wmchauncey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 464


« on: June 10, 2007, 01:56:10 PM »
ReplyReply

Using canon xti with sigma 55-200 mm lens, shooting 200 mm in RAW at a cell phone tower 1/2 mile away to check for clarity in Colorado.  There is no haze and no adjustments were made in ACR.

Should my image be burry at 200% magnification in ACR?  I'm just trying to determine what to expect from my lens and if a better lens would give more clarity at that distance.
Logged

The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/chauncey43
mahleu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 577


WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2007, 02:42:00 AM »
ReplyReply

Do you have a UV filter on? Are you steady when you shoot?
Logged

______________________________________________________________________
Anyone selling a 1DSIII or 6D cheap?
larsrc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 173


WWW
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2007, 04:59:36 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Using canon xti with sigma 55-200 mm lens, shooting 200 mm in RAW at a cell phone tower 1/2 mile away to check for clarity in Colorado.  There is no haze and no adjustments were made in ACR.

Should my image be burry at 200% magnification in ACR?  I'm just trying to determine what to expect from my lens and if a better lens would give more clarity at that distance.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Did you have the camera on a tripod and use shutter-lockup with delay?  What aperture did you use it at?  Photozone does indicate that the lens is capable of very good sharpness: [a href=\"http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/sigma_55200_456/index.htm]http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/si...0_456/index.htm[/url]

-Lars
Logged

:Ollivr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2007, 06:39:49 AM »
ReplyReply

how blurry is blurry? could you post a crop?
a cheap lens like that at such a focal length and an AA'ed bayer sensor AND 200% on-screen interpolation can get you soft images. If it looks good at 50% it should be fine.

O.
Logged
wmchauncey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 464


« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2007, 09:08:11 AM »
ReplyReply

I have takn this shot several times over several days at different settings always using tripod and remote without mirror lockup and without polarizing lens. The results are the same.
I just want to know if I'm expecting to much from the lens at 1/2 mile and 200% magnification in ACR.  Looks good at 50%.
Logged

The things you do for yourself die with you, the things you do for others live forever.
A man's worth should be judged, not when he basks in the sun, but how he faces the storm.

My stuff...http://1x.com/member/chauncey43
mahleu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 577


WWW
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2007, 11:44:46 AM »
ReplyReply

Ok, you have 2 possibilties.
1, the camera is either front or rear focussing
2, the lens has a problem
3, you picked a murky/hazy etc day
4, You're being too critical. If its sharp at 100% then it's probably fine
« Last Edit: June 11, 2007, 11:51:38 AM by mahleu » Logged

______________________________________________________________________
Anyone selling a 1DSIII or 6D cheap?
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad