Ad
Ad
Ad
Luminous Landscape Forum > The Art of Photography > User Critiques > website
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: website  (Read 6039 times)
Chris_Brown
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 636



WWW
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2007, 12:37:16 PM »
 ReplyReply
Quote
now I am looking for a automatic redirection script... any idea thanks.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
[a href=\"http://www.hotscripts.com/]HotScripts![/url]
Logged
~ CB
Morgan_Moore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2037


WWW
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2007, 01:57:20 PM »
 ReplyReply
A further thought on organisation.

Some of your images of the exteriors of buildings are 'personal' not 'architecture'

If you consider 'architecture' as work aimed at or commissioned by real estate type clients

And personal to be images that you enjoy shooting, looking at, displaying your view of the world, or whatever personal means

S
« Last Edit: November 06, 2007, 01:58:37 PM by Morgan_Moore » Logged
Sam Morgan Moore Cornwall
www.sammorganmoore.com -photography
Kagetsu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 188


WWW
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2007, 04:14:19 PM »
 ReplyReply
I like the site, it's streamlined, and slick, but not overly bold.
The only thing I'd suggest changing is the three images on the front page. They load fantastic in Safari, but Explorer interpolates when reducing the image sizes in imbeded pictures, rather then sampling, which gives it an aliased look.
Logged
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad