Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Film scanning histogram  (Read 9197 times)
Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548


WWW
« Reply #20 on: November 22, 2007, 01:04:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Dmerger,

Sorry I am out of town for awhile. You may be right. I will redo the 16 bit tests when I get back. My 16 bit tests were done a couple of scanners ago and a few versions of SF back. I haven't done them in a few years. I'll revisit this when I get back.
« Last Edit: November 22, 2007, 02:24:30 PM by Kirk Gittings » Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
Kirk Gittings
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1548


WWW
« Reply #21 on: January 20, 2008, 06:19:12 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
possibly because the adjustment is being made to 10, 12, or 14 bit data before saving out as 8 bit.
THe same adjustment in PS is being made on 8 bit information.
Very few scanners/software allow software analogue adjustment of the scan itself.
Tyler
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=154307\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

This is what SF says on the subject. As I read it the software is controlling the scanner to deliver a full 16 bit histogram with adjustments in place. I have tried for some time to get a clearer statement about this from them but my "good" contacts at SF are long gone. I think though that regardless, Tylers point is pretty true, that as long as you are working in 16 bit with low noise scans, it doesn't matter much.
Logged

Thanks,
Kirk

Kirk Gittings
Architecture and Landscape Photography
WWW.GITTINGSPHOTO.COM

LIGHT+SPACE+STRUCTURE (blog)
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad