Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Separating 'raw' functions in raw converters  (Read 10182 times)
NikosR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 622


WWW
« on: April 30, 2008, 03:30:08 AM »
ReplyReply

Perhaps you will be interested in commenting to my philosophical moaning below:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=25031
Logged

Nikos
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9316



WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2008, 08:27:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Perhaps you will be interested in commenting to my philosophical moaning below:

http://luminous-landscape.com/forum/index....showtopic=25031
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=192634\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I wasn't the first time it was posted, certainly not the third!
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
NikosR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 622


WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2008, 08:51:54 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I wasn't the first time it was posted, certainly not the third!
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=192664\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Thank you for your kind words. BTW, if there was a single generic thread about raw converters I would have posted it there but unfortunately there isn't.
Logged

Nikos
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9316



WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2008, 09:04:30 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
BTW, if there was a single generic thread about raw converters I would have posted it there but unfortunately there isn't.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=192670\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

There's no need for multiple posts. Most here are smart enough to either scan the forums they wish or ask to view new posts, your one post would be seen.
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
NikosR
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 622


WWW
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2008, 09:32:27 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
There's no need for multiple posts. Most here are smart enough to either scan the forums they wish or ask to view new posts, your one post would be seen.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=192671\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I, for one, very seldom scan the Aperture forum since I don't regularly use that software. But maybe I'm not smart enough.

I think you have wasted much more of your time (and mine) complaining about my multiple references to a single post (and not multiple posts, mind you) than I have with the said multiple references.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2008, 09:33:59 AM by NikosR » Logged

Nikos
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2008, 09:53:58 AM »
ReplyReply

gotta complain about something.
Logged
Mark D Segal
Contributor
Sr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 7126


WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2008, 08:07:10 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I, for one, very seldom scan the Aperture forum since I don't regularly use that software. But maybe I'm not smart enough.

I think you have wasted much more of your time (and mine) complaining about my multiple references to a single post (and not multiple posts, mind you) than I have with the said multiple references.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=192675\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Nikos, this just causes confusion. My advice: don't do it. Start one thread on one topic and leave it at that. It doesn't deserve any more or less attention if it appears in one place or in three.

Mark
Logged

Mark D Segal (formerly MarkDS)
Author: "Scanning Workflows with SilverFast 8....." http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/film/scanning_workflows_with_silverfast_8.shtml
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad