Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Chuffed.  (Read 3763 times)
Justinr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1027


WWW
« on: May 11, 2008, 05:56:29 PM »
ReplyReply

I came away with this yesterday-

Lady of the lake

Justin
« Last Edit: May 12, 2008, 07:43:01 AM by Justinr » Logged

JMCP
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 86


« Reply #1 on: May 12, 2008, 06:02:15 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I came away with this yesterday-

Lady of the lake

Justin
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=195109\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Justin,

you may want to change the colour of the text used for your footer menu as the yellow is too light on top of the bright background.


Cheers John
Logged
Justinr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1027


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2008, 03:42:39 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Justin,

you may want to change the colour of the text used for your footer menu as the yellow is too light on top of the bright background.
Cheers John
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=195305\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


John

I usually hide it well away at the bottom of the page so folk don't get to see it anyway, but as this is a short page you are probably right.

Thanks

Justin.
Logged

popnfresh
Guest
« Reply #3 on: May 22, 2008, 06:38:04 PM »
ReplyReply

I have to be honest with you and say that I don't find this portrait particularly attractive. The lighting is flat. The eyes look underexposed and lack good catch lights. She's got kind of a weird smirk on her face, and it looks like she's being squeezed too tightly by that thing she's wearing.
« Last Edit: May 22, 2008, 06:41:31 PM by popnfresh » Logged
Justinr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1027


WWW
« Reply #4 on: May 25, 2008, 01:02:25 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I have to be honest with you and say that I don't find this portrait particularly attractive. The lighting is flat. The eyes look underexposed and lack good catch lights. She's got kind of a weird smirk on her face, and it looks like she's being squeezed too tightly by that thing she's wearing.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=197331\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]


Well it's good to hear that there are those for whom it doesn't work.

For myself I don't like big shiny catchlights anyway, they can too easily detract from the overall image and are a bit of a cliché. I think the faintest hint of under exposure works well here, she is a warm hearted and intelligent lady rather than a glam model, so overall I think she is captured well.

Justin.
Logged

kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4056



« Reply #5 on: May 25, 2008, 03:14:20 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Well it's good to hear that there are those for whom it doesn't work.

For myself I don't like big shiny catchlights anyway, they can too easily detract from the overall image and are a bit of a cliché. I think the faintest hint of under exposure works well here, she is a warm hearted and intelligent lady rather than a glam model, so overall I think she is captured well.

Justin.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=197893\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
Well, as long as you're happy, that's OK.

Jeremy
Logged
Andy M
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 333


WWW
« Reply #6 on: May 25, 2008, 03:20:11 PM »
ReplyReply

It appears you're happy with it (which is good ), but I personally would boost exposure very slightly, and also reduce the green saturation - the trees take away too much attention off the lady IMO.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad