Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Wireless Firewire  (Read 2141 times)
Graham Mitchell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2271



WWW
« on: May 13, 2008, 10:47:31 PM »
ReplyReply

Wireless USB exists, so why not wireless Firewire? Does anyone know if this exists yet or is on the way? It would be great to work cable-free and tethered at the same time. Of course the full transfer rate would have to be supported to maintain a decent frame rate.
Logged

Graham Mitchell - www.graham-mitchell.com
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #1 on: May 13, 2008, 11:09:07 PM »
ReplyReply

I don't think I would turn on a wireless device that could support firewire speeds without wearing lead boxers.   Copy a file across the wireless link and get branded by your prince albert.

I found this ....  http://www.1394ta.org/Press/2004Press/may/5.10.a.htm

It is pretty old and I didn't see anything for wireless firewire products.  I checked a place I used to work that offered usb like wireless things and didn't see anything.
Logged
newrooky
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


WWW
« Reply #2 on: May 13, 2008, 11:10:56 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Wireless USB exists, so why not wireless Firewire? Does anyone know if this exists yet or is on the way? It would be great to work cable-free and tethered at the same time. Of course the full transfer rate would have to be supported to maintain a decent frame rate.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

If i remember correctly, it was on the way in late 2004 but was later (sometime in 2006) put to rest as a standard.    So no, doesn't exist, and no isn't on its way.  

Speculative and explicit info can be found on wikipedia
[a href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMedia_Alliance#IEEE]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiMedia_Alliance#IEEE[/url]

and the IEEE withdrawn website page
http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG3a.html


new standards are in the works and eventually you'll be able to shoot wireless with instant computer review.
Logged

[span style='font-family:Geneva'][span style='color:gray']Brandon Waterman   -  Photo+[/span][/span]
shutay
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 13, 2008, 11:20:53 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
I don't think I would turn on a wireless device that could support firewire speeds without wearing lead boxers.   Copy a file across the wireless link and get branded by your prince albert.

I found this ....  http://www.1394ta.org/Press/2004Press/may/5.10.a.htm

It is pretty old and I didn't see anything for wireless firewire products.  I checked a place I used to work that offered usb like wireless things and didn't see anything.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=195624\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

That's a funny thought, but I would be more concerned about that mobile phone in your pocket all day. WiFi routers typically transmit at 30mW, Bluetooth even less at 10mW (depends on your radio tho), but GSM can go up as high as 2W! At 2W, that's a whole 66.7X more power pouring into your boxers at any given moment, and you don't usually keep your Wireless router/USB in your pocket.
Logged
billthecat
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


« Reply #4 on: May 13, 2008, 11:58:29 PM »
ReplyReply

There is wireless 1394 over coax. I don't know if that counts.

Bill
Logged
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2008, 12:02:26 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
There is wireless 1394 over coax. I don't know if that counts.

Bill
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=195634\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Wired wireless?  What kind of bizarro world insanity is this?
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad