Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Ken Rockwell's Fifteen Feet - Portrait Lenses  (Read 87910 times)
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8619



WWW
« Reply #160 on: June 09, 2013, 04:35:35 PM »
ReplyReply

You're overstepping a line here, and I strongly urge you to retract your analogy, take a deep breath and come back to this discussion when you have come to your senses. 

Nope, not going to happen (a retraction), as there are some seriously stupid, closed minded people who actually believe what I wrote is true and can't grasp a fact based reality.
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4783



« Reply #161 on: June 09, 2013, 05:03:26 PM »
ReplyReply

Why are people wasting any time discussing Ken Rockewell's nonsense? Much of his writings are a blight on the photographic community and are just plain factually incorrect. Not just misguided opinion, but plain wrong. When cornered he bleats..."Just kidding".

You might as well be debating with a Flat Earther. Let's move on from giving his useless blather even one more moment of exposure here.

Michael
Logged
Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2046


« Reply #162 on: June 09, 2013, 10:59:44 PM »
ReplyReply

Why are people wasting any time discussing Ken Rockewell's nonsense? Much of his writings are a blight on the photographic community and are just plain factually incorrect. Not just misguided opinion, but plain wrong. When cornered he bleats..."Just kidding".

You might as well be debating with a Flat Earther. Let's move on from giving his useless blather even one more moment of exposure here.

Michael
Amen!
Logged
Bryan Conner
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 514


WWW
« Reply #163 on: June 09, 2013, 11:39:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Why are people wasting any time discussing Ken Rockewell's nonsense? Much of his writings are a blight on the photographic community and are just plain factually incorrect. Not just misguided opinion, but plain wrong. When cornered he bleats..."Just kidding".

You might as well be debating with a Flat Earther. Let's move on from giving his useless blather even one more moment of exposure here.

Michael

I agree 100%.  Plus, your post made me laugh out loud.
« Last Edit: June 09, 2013, 11:44:18 PM by Bryan Conner » Logged

hjulenissen
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1666


« Reply #164 on: June 10, 2013, 05:23:53 AM »
ReplyReply

Once again, you are making an assumption that every photographer's wet dream is to become a measurbator.
I think that this is a derogatory term that tends to cause derailing of discussions.

-h
Logged
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2525


« Reply #165 on: June 10, 2013, 06:08:44 AM »
ReplyReply

Unfortunately this thread hasn't been the poster's "finest hour" and possibly he will think again about his contribution?  Sad
Logged

Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 5530



WWW
« Reply #166 on: June 10, 2013, 10:02:22 AM »
ReplyReply

I think that this is a derogatory term that tends to cause derailing of discussions.

-h

Guess who invented the term Wink


P.S. Btw, I consider myself a card-carrying member of the measurbators club
« Last Edit: June 10, 2013, 10:18:21 AM by Slobodan Blagojevic » Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 5530



WWW
« Reply #167 on: June 10, 2013, 10:16:40 AM »
ReplyReply

Unfortunately this thread hasn't been the poster's "finest hour" and possibly he will think again about his contribution?  Sad

Not sure if you are referring to me, but if you are, I will gladly admit I've been "rethinking" my participation (not contribution) even before I jumped into the fray. I knew perfectly well that walking into a church and telling people there is no God, is, as a minimum, futile. And yet, against my better judgment, I did it, hoping, (in vain, as it turns out) that we can at least tolerate, if not respect, people with different opinions and approaches than our own. The amount of venom and name calling I got in return speaks more about the "strength" of your arguments than the arguments themselves.
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
NancyP
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 787


« Reply #168 on: June 10, 2013, 04:06:16 PM »
ReplyReply

Who gives a sh*t about autofocus on macro lenses? They aren't designed for fast AF - due to the long focus throw. "Some" AF is handy if you are using the lens as a short-telephoto general purpose lens, and in most conditions the typical s-l-o-w AF is fine, particularly if you help the lens by using the focus limiter.
Logged
Alan Klein
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 640



WWW
« Reply #169 on: June 10, 2013, 04:24:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Not sure if you are referring to me, but if you are, I will gladly admit I've been "rethinking" my participation (not contribution) even before I jumped into the fray. I knew perfectly well that walking into a church and telling people there is no God, is, as a minimum, futile. And yet, against my better judgment, I did it, hoping, (in vain, as it turns out) that we can at least tolerate, if not respect, people with different opinions and approaches than our own. The amount of venom and name calling I got in return speaks more about the "strength" of your arguments than the arguments themselves.

I'm glad you jumped into the fray Slobodan so I wouldn't have been alone.  Thanks.  Alan
Logged
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2525


« Reply #170 on: June 11, 2013, 02:47:12 AM »
ReplyReply

Thinking of getting married? Wink Grin  Smiley's added to convey a humorous intent. Smiley
Logged

jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3209



WWW
« Reply #171 on: June 11, 2013, 03:13:11 AM »
ReplyReply

Why are people wasting any time discussing Ken Rockewell's nonsense? Much of his writings are a blight on the photographic community and are just plain factually incorrect. Not just misguided opinion, but plain wrong. When cornered he bleats..."Just kidding".
He's Mister Cop-Out with that line.

Quote
You might as well be debating with a Flat Earther. Let's move on from giving his useless blather even one more moment of exposure here.
He's like the photography equivalent of the UK's Daily Mail newspaper with their disregard for facts, hypocrisy and controversial nonsense - but it's the newspaper website with the highest no. of page views in world now apparently.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 786



« Reply #172 on: June 11, 2013, 05:16:17 AM »
ReplyReply

He's Mister Cop-Out with that line.
He's like the photography equivalent of the UK's Daily Mail newspaper with their disregard for facts, hypocrisy and controversial nonsense - but it's the newspaper website with the highest no. of page views in world now apparently.

You know what's the most viewed
Teevee chanel here?
Tv5
You know who owns tv5?
Berlusconi...
Have you ever seen the content they
Provide?
Check it out...
It's worth
Logged
NikoJorj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1063


WWW
« Reply #173 on: June 11, 2013, 05:37:05 AM »
ReplyReply

Still lurking in case a few more wagons happen to ride into the crash site and dismantel...

You know who owns tv5?
Berlusconi...
You sure? Wiki says something else, and Berlusconi did own LaCinq a while ago, which was ohyeahgodawwwwful, exactly the kind of please-do-not-use-your-brain content at the core of the topic (TV channels are usual suspects for that), but pushed to the extreme...
I don't watch any teevee since two decades and so won't comment on TV5.
Logged

Nicolas from Grenoble
A small gallery
fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 786



« Reply #174 on: June 11, 2013, 10:54:04 AM »
ReplyReply

Still lurking in case a few more wagons happen to ride into the crash site and dismantel...
You sure? Wiki says something else, and Berlusconi did own LaCinq a while ago, which was ohyeahgodawwwwful, exactly the kind of please-do-not-use-your-brain content at the core of the topic (TV channels are usual suspects for that), but pushed to the extreme...
I don't watch any teevee since two decades and so won't comment on TV5.
Niko, not the french tv5, the spanish one.
I'm french but currently live in Madrid.

Spanish tv5 belongs to mediaset that belongs
To fininvest that belongs to Berlusconi.

You have no idea about the level of crapperies
Non-sense, polemic, low profile programs, I
Mean you have to see it to beleive it.
Verdict: high audience.


« Last Edit: June 11, 2013, 10:59:59 AM by fredjeang2 » Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 5530



WWW
« Reply #175 on: June 11, 2013, 11:09:59 AM »
ReplyReply

Thinking of getting married? Wink Grin

Well, since Ken is already married, I had to move on... Grin
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 666



WWW
« Reply #176 on: June 11, 2013, 04:54:11 PM »
ReplyReply

Nope, not going to happen (a retraction), as there are some seriously stupid, closed minded people who actually believe what I wrote is true and can't grasp a fact based reality.
It's not about whether or not the analogy is accurate. There is a view that using the holocaust analogy in (relatively) trivial circumstances trivializes the holocaust. That was certainly my reaction when I read your post. I am sure it wasn't your intention.
Logged

digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8619



WWW
« Reply #177 on: June 11, 2013, 05:03:03 PM »
ReplyReply

It's not about whether or not the analogy is accurate. There is a view that using the holocaust analogy in (relatively) trivial circumstances trivializes the holocaust. That was certainly my reaction when I read your post. I am sure it wasn't your intention.

There's nothing trivial about the holocaust or people who don't believe it, or people who can't fathom the idea of fact based reality which some here subscribe. And I'll further point out that I have distant relatives who lost their lives in holocaust! Maybe you do, maybe you don't but don't read into my analogy I believe this is trivial.
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
kencameron
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 666



WWW
« Reply #178 on: June 11, 2013, 05:30:49 PM »
ReplyReply

There's nothing trivial about the holocaust or people who don't believe it, or people who can't fathom the idea of fact based reality which some here subscribe. And I'll further point out that I have distant relatives who lost their lives in holocaust! Maybe you do, maybe you don't but don't read into my analogy I believe this is trivial.
I wasn't reading any such thing into your analogy, as an attentive reading of my post will make clear. The view I am alluding to that proper respect for the exceptional gravity of the holocaust makes it unseemly to refer to it simply to make an argument about Ken Rockwell, or any other matter as relatively unimportant as that. It is a fact that some people will react in that way, as I did. Doing so doesn't imply anything about your views on the holocaust. What is at issue is your choice of analogy. For me, it came across as "over the top" and hence as detracting from the force of your argument (with which I otherwise agree).
« Last Edit: June 11, 2013, 06:26:15 PM by kencameron » Logged

fredjeang2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 786



« Reply #179 on: June 11, 2013, 06:08:31 PM »
ReplyReply

I think we should pattent this thread and
Sell the all content to a Berlusconi tv.
They would buy it.
With the benefits we all share,
We all go to a still workshop
Given by KR.

Michael included who needs to pulish
His skills in jpeg capture
And sRGB printings.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2013, 06:11:27 PM by fredjeang2 » Logged
Pages: « 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad