Overprocessed?

[Drew M Wright]

Overprocessed?

[LoisWakeman]

I like the way the array of flower stems echoes the sun rays, and the colour harmonies here.

[DarkPenguin]

Either over or under.

The two flowers in the front are chopped on the bottom.  All I can see now.

[k bennett]

To be honest, I would snap up the local contrast, darken the sky, and lighten the flowers. So, for me I would say it wasn't overprocessed, no. Nice shot, though.

[Rob C]

The two flowers in the front are chopped on the bottom.  All I can see now.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210623\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
[/quote]



Hi Mr P

It´s catching, the cutting...

Reminds me of the craze for cutting off models´ heads or, in this case, feet. Have to admit guilt - regarding heads - as an aide to anonymity.

Rob C

[daws]

FWIW, to me it's less an issue of overprocessing and more one of competing stories. I'd give k bennett's suggestion above a try. (You might try looking at the image upside down -- what bennett is suggesting pops out.) Compositionally, given what's happening on the top & sides, it feels like the bottom might want a bit more breathing room.

[gdanmitchell]

Took this image on the way back from dinner in Grand Teton National Park a few weeks back.  Thoughts?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=210618\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

It is a nice image and  those light rays are lovely. I would actually lean in the direction of _more_ "processing" - the current rendition strikes me as being a bit dark, at least on my monitor.

I agree with the points about composition. Given what you have here I might also consider a bit of a crop on the left side where the ridge begins to rise again.

Take care,

Dan

[kaelaria]

It reminds me of something......hmmm.....