Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Color Photography version of Lenswork  (Read 29073 times)
PhillyPhotographer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


« on: August 07, 2008, 09:50:20 PM »
ReplyReply

Is there a color photography magazine that would be considered the equivalent of lenswork ?
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8219



WWW
« Reply #1 on: August 07, 2008, 10:37:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Nothing that I've ever heard of.
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
dalethorn
Guest
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2008, 07:30:10 AM »
ReplyReply

One photog I know whose favorite B&W mag is Lenswork says his favorite colour mag is JPG.
Logged
dalethorn
Guest
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2008, 07:33:14 AM »
ReplyReply

Of course if you scan this forum in the Critiques and Post Your Current Works threads, you can amass a goodly number of interesting images, as good as most magazines.
Logged
Tim Gray
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2002



WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2008, 07:59:18 AM »
ReplyReply

Also the disk version of Lenswork contains additional content - including some color.
Logged
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2008, 09:34:07 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Also the disk version of Lenswork contains additional content - including some color.
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I love the DVD version of lenswork.

I pick up JPG on occasion.

If you like podcasts (and a lot more) there is [a href=\"http://inmotion.magnumphotos.com/]Magnum in Motion[/url].

Edit:  I forgot to mention that Camera Arts is crap.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2008, 09:34:54 AM by DarkPenguin » Logged
Geoff Wittig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1017


« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2008, 11:59:42 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Is there a color photography magazine that would be considered the equivalent of lenswork ?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=213790\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Good question. There are very few magazines oriented toward photographs and photographic art, rather than gear. This is what Aperture should be about, but unfortunately the magazine got increasingly bizarre and post-modern over its many years under Michael Hoffman, and its current editorial direction is (if possible) even worse. JPG varies with the issue, but seems way too self-consciously hip and fashion oriented. And Camera Arts has become just awful—lots of precious, overly manipulated digital images with emphasis on the intentionally bizarre.

The best current source for color work IMHO is actually View Camera magazine.  Each edition is split between black & white and color, but there is intelligent discussion of both technical and artistic issues, and some of the color work is simply gorgeous. You don't need to shoot large format to learn from it.
Logged
usathyan
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184



WWW
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2008, 12:39:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Deleted.
« Last Edit: August 12, 2008, 12:40:59 PM by usathyan » Logged

--------------
Umesh Bhatt
http://www.8thcross.com/blog/
PhillyPhotographer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


« Reply #8 on: August 19, 2008, 03:27:57 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks everyone. I picked up a JPG and even though it's not really what I was looking for it is interesting.
Logged

pete_truman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 116


WWW
« Reply #9 on: August 19, 2008, 03:45:13 PM »
ReplyReply

You might try Ag magazine from the UK. It is certainly not a colour version of Lenswork but is about photography and certainty not equipment! It does have a degree of commonality with Lenswork in that Bill Jay is a regular contributor.

Check out www.ag-photo.co.uk

Pete
Logged

Pete Truman
BFoto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 241



WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 19, 2008, 05:53:50 PM »
ReplyReply

'Focus' is nice.

Lots of great work mainly in color. Little too much peripheral stuff, but still lots of work on display.
Logged

Mike Louw
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 137



WWW
« Reply #11 on: August 19, 2008, 06:05:46 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Is there a color photography magazine that would be considered the equivalent of lenswork ?
[{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

[a href=\"http://www.phot-art.com]http://www.phot-art.com[/url]. IMO, the quality of the images is as good as Lenswork, although very different.

Mike
Logged

Geoff Wittig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1017


« Reply #12 on: August 19, 2008, 09:10:51 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
'Focus' is nice.

Lots of great work mainly in color. Little too much peripheral stuff, but still lots of work on display.
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=216124\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

I can't agree with you here. Focus is basically a vanity-publishing project, wherein photographers desperate to see their work in print cough up some serious cash to buy a few pages. There are also a few sections included in each issue by well known and accomplished photographers to "salt the mine" so to speak; they obviously don't have to pay to get in. Each photographer only gets a couple of pages, generally four or five images at most; nowhere near a real portfolio like Lenswork provides.
Logged
BFoto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 241



WWW
« Reply #13 on: August 20, 2008, 12:19:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Focus is basically a vanity-publishing project, wherein photographers desperate to see their work in print cough up some serious cash to buy a few pages. [a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=216149\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Excuse my rudeness when i say that sounds like sour grapes!

That's a fairly serious claim. Can anyone else substantiate that?
Logged

Geoff Wittig
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1017


« Reply #14 on: August 20, 2008, 05:16:47 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Excuse my rudeness when i say that sounds like sour grapes!

That's a fairly serious claim. Can anyone else substantiate that?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=216261\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]

Check out George Barr's blog. He mentions his regret at buying a spot in Focus because he felt a bit "dirty" afterwards.

Nope, I never tried to get in. No sour grapes here.
Logged
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #15 on: August 20, 2008, 05:21:41 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Focus - you have to be famous to get in free, the rest pay a significant fee for the privilege of being published, which taints the whole idea of being accepted (are you accepted for your skill, or your money). The publisher is very pushy. Perhaps he has the right idea, and I confess I went for it a couple of years ago, but have had second thoughts ever since, and as for his claims of it going out to collectors and generating business for you - I have heard from several people that this is not the case - you are very unlikely to make back the cost of entry (which is > $1000).

georgebarr.blogspot.com/search?q=focus+magazine
Logged
jecxz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 377


WWW
« Reply #16 on: August 20, 2008, 05:59:46 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote
Excuse my rudeness when i say that sounds like sour grapes!

That's a fairly serious claim. Can anyone else substantiate that?
[a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=216261\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a]
BFoto, I was going to ask the same thing but I had known for some reason that Focus was all about paid artist advertisements. But I'm glad you asked because I got to read the subsequent link - thank you.

Regarding paying for advertisements: I believe the purpose for those advertisements in Focus is to promote your exhibition or gallery showing. I most certainly hope that Mr. Barr didn’t think he’d get famous by purchasing one advertisement. You would need many months / issues of purchased advertisements to become famous in Focus. I also would not doubt that the publisher probably led him to believe it; the publisher has to eat too.

Advertising is hit or miss – Mr. Barr would not have complained had a gallery seen his work and picked him up – in fact, we’d never have heard of it at all.

I stopped subscribing to Focus because I didn’t really care about who was showing in what gallery. In fact, I have stopped almost all of my magazine subscriptions except for Lenswork.
Logged

joergen geerds
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


WWW
« Reply #17 on: November 03, 2008, 12:00:13 PM »
ReplyReply

MagnaChrom was an outstandingly nice magazine, delivered via PDF. Unfortunately, the magazine doesn't seem to exist anymore, and it's editor moved all his efforts/traffic/editorial to his blog:

http://www.magnachrom.com/

Contact me if you are interested, I still have a couple of PDFs from 2007 on my HD. Or ask your favorite search engine or the way-back-when-machine.

Logged

luong
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 208



WWW
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2008, 05:53:00 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, the portfolio section of Focus is paid advertising. Initially the publisher was criticized for making it appear like editorial, but supposedly this has been made more clear. Only the interviews are editorial.

Other print magazines that emphasize photographic art in both color and B&W are Blindspot and  Aperture, although they are more heavily tilted towards contemporary photography than lenswork. Photoeye and Camera Arts are worth checking online.
Logged

PhillyPhotographer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 334


« Reply #19 on: January 02, 2009, 10:25:39 PM »
ReplyReply

My wish came true !!!

http://bandwmag.com/color/color.html
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad