Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Canon 200 F2 IS L  (Read 8671 times)
jani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1604



WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 05, 2008, 05:39:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: dchew
Much of the harshness may be from the very light, blown out background.  Panopeeper's background examples are light but they still have color, so they aren't nearly as challenging.
Yes, the problem is with the composition, specifically the (poor) choice of background. IMO, this is primarily visible in the first picture.

How we choose to compose our images have significant effect on how a lens appears to perform.
Logged

Jan
eronald
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4053



« Reply #21 on: October 05, 2008, 06:32:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Hehe, here is what I used my 200/1.8 for. Two different shows, obviously, left is Dior (look for the dice).


edmund
Logged
David Anderson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 474



WWW
« Reply #22 on: October 05, 2008, 10:02:49 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: jani
Yes, the problem is with the composition, specifically the (poor) choice of background. IMO, this is primarily visible in the first picture.

Bloody kids, they can't even choose a background !    


Logged

David Anderson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 474



WWW
« Reply #23 on: October 05, 2008, 10:04:27 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: eronald
Hehe, here is what I used my 200/1.8 for. Two different shows, obviously, left is Dior (look for the dice).
 )


Logged

jani
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1604



WWW
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2008, 03:03:59 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: David Anderson
Bloody kids, they can't even choose a background !  
I stand corrected, those kids are very promising photographers.  
Logged

Jan
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad