Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: New Macbook Pros and Macbooks  (Read 16951 times)
jing q
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 594


WWW
« on: October 14, 2008, 01:30:03 PM »
ReplyReply

Sigh, looks like the Macbook Pros are still heavy
    5.5 pounds (2.49 kg)1

Macbooks don't have Firewire anymore.

Logged
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2008, 01:36:01 PM »
ReplyReply

I know, odd that no firewire. Was going to get one (waiting for the news) but now... guess it'll be pro. Seems like a waste though.
Logged
jing q
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 594


WWW
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2008, 01:39:32 PM »
ReplyReply

was hoping for a 13 inch Pro. lugging a frigging 15 incher around just to tether is a pain in the ass.
Logged
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« Reply #3 on: October 14, 2008, 01:42:49 PM »
ReplyReply

Yeah, unnecessary. Not sure what I'm going to do now.
Logged
vandevanterSH
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 626


« Reply #4 on: October 14, 2008, 01:48:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Anthony R
I know, odd that no firewire. Was going to get one (waiting for the news) but now... guess it'll be pro. Seems like a waste though.

Does the 13" MacBook have an Express slot?  If so can you use a Firewire Express card??

Steve
Logged
arashm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 142


« Reply #5 on: October 14, 2008, 01:54:35 PM »
ReplyReply

how does everyone feel about the new Glass screen?
also ONE fw 800 Only for the MBP?!!
ma
Logged
Dustbak
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2359


« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2008, 02:10:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Only a glossy screen, no option for a matte. The Macbook is IMO downgraded in spec's and upgraded in price. I don't get this move.
Logged
richardhagen
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 67


« Reply #7 on: October 14, 2008, 02:10:51 PM »
ReplyReply

how in heck can you connect a digital back that requires a FW 400 port? these new mac book pros have only FW 800.  

rh
Logged
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2008, 02:13:53 PM »
ReplyReply

WTF Apple? on so many levels...
Logged
jing q
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 594


WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 14, 2008, 02:22:03 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: richardhagen
how in heck can you connect a digital back that requires a FW 400 port? these new mac book pros have only FW 800.  

rh

there are 800 to 400 cables...those should work.

Logged
NBP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


WWW
« Reply #10 on: October 14, 2008, 02:25:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Anthony R
WTF Apple? on so many levels...

Yeah, down from 3 USB's, FW400 & 800 to only 2 USB's & an FW800
Huh??


Glad I've got a couple of 'old' ones.
Logged
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« Reply #11 on: October 14, 2008, 02:34:29 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: John Schweikert
So has something changed that allows a boot volume to work from USB 2.0? I still run 10.4.11 on all machines, so firewire is a must and I use it all the time on my Macbook. Sucks no firewire for the new one.

I do like the new 24" LED cinema display but why the constant need to use new connector ports. I hope it can connect via an adapter to DVI ports on G5 and Mac Pro towers.

New display is a consumer monitor for too much money. Like the ACD sucks, this does too. Money better spent elsewhere.
Logged
Jack Flesher
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2595



WWW
« Reply #12 on: October 14, 2008, 02:54:47 PM »
ReplyReply

This might suit you for a 13" option: http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/Modbook
« Last Edit: October 14, 2008, 02:56:09 PM by Jack Flesher » Logged

BJNY
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1112


« Reply #13 on: October 14, 2008, 02:55:29 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: richardhagen
how in heck can you connect a digital back that requires a FW 400 port? these new mac book pros have only FW 800.  

rh


A simple $8 gender adapter:


http://www.1394store.com/eshop/product.asp...mp;pf%5Fid=1651
Logged

Guillermo
terence_patrick
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 149


WWW
« Reply #14 on: October 14, 2008, 03:05:56 PM »
ReplyReply

The glass screens are terrible. I once tried using an iMac on a set outdoors in the sun and even with a rigged foamcore shade plus a few floppies behind me, I could see the reflections of people standing around the screen more than I could see the actual photos.

Apple has jumped the shark.
Logged
NBP
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 184


WWW
« Reply #15 on: October 14, 2008, 03:15:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: BJNY
A simple $8 gender adapter:

Great.
Another connection to add into the chain to go wobbly or get constantly pulled out.
Logged
Wayne Fox
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2811



WWW
« Reply #16 on: October 14, 2008, 03:58:49 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: arashm
how does everyone feel about the new Glass screen?
also ONE fw 800 Only for the MBP?!!
ma

Been using the glossy screen option for a long time ... I prefer it.   Took me a week or two to get used to it, but the glossy screen is far more useful in far more places and lighting conditions while traveling.
Logged

Mort54
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 590


WWW
« Reply #17 on: October 14, 2008, 04:05:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: NBP
Great.
Another connection to add into the chain to go wobbly or get constantly pulled out.
You don't need the extra adapter. Just get an 800 to 400 cable. The Firewire 800 port supports both 800 and 400, but you'll need the 400 connector on one end of the cable.
Logged

I Reject Your Reality And Substitute My Own
BJNY
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1112


« Reply #18 on: October 14, 2008, 04:08:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Mort54
You don't need the extra adapter. Just get an 800 to 400 cable. The Firewire 800 port supports both 800 and 400, but you'll need the 400 connector on one end of the cable.

My suggestion is for those who already own many FW400 to FW400 cables.
Logged

Guillermo
BJNY
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1112


« Reply #19 on: October 14, 2008, 04:10:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Wayne Fox
Been using the glossy screen option for a long time ... I prefer it.   Took me a week or two to get used to it, but the glossy screen is far more useful in far more places and lighting conditions while traveling.

Would like to know how a glossy screen is far more useful, and under what conditions?
Thank you.
« Last Edit: October 14, 2008, 04:21:43 PM by BJNY » Logged

Guillermo
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad