drevil
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 25
|
 |
« Reply #4000 on: December 09, 2012, 08:21:22 AM » |
Reply
|
 Contax 645 with 35mm 3.5 and p45+ C&C welcome Best regards Mirko
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rschmid
|
 |
« Reply #4001 on: December 09, 2012, 12:32:48 PM » |
Reply
|
Shodo Harada Roshi, Rinzai Zen master, abbot of Sogenji monastery in Okayama, Japan. Picture taken with Hasselblad 500c/m with CFV-39, Planar 3.5/100mm
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 09, 2012, 12:38:15 PM by rschmid »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
rschmid
|
 |
« Reply #4002 on: December 09, 2012, 12:37:51 PM » |
Reply
|
Shodo Harada Roshi, Rinzai Zen master, abbot of Sogenji monastery in Okayama, Japan. Picture taken with Hasselblad 500c/m with CFV-39, S-Planar 5.6/120mm
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eric Myrvaagnes
|
 |
« Reply #4004 on: December 09, 2012, 05:48:15 PM » |
Reply
|
A well-named series, indeed, Michael. But very classy "eerie" as we expect of you.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
 |
« Reply #4005 on: December 09, 2012, 07:16:53 PM » |
Reply
|
What Eric said, me too. Not really my style, but interesting, I suppose, in an 'eerie' way...
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SecondFocus
|
 |
« Reply #4006 on: December 14, 2012, 10:59:40 AM » |
Reply
|
From a series I shot with a Mamiya DM33. I think at the time I first processed these in Leaf Capture. But I am liking Capture One much better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MichaelEzra
|
 |
« Reply #4007 on: December 14, 2012, 09:02:57 PM » |
Reply
|
A less eerie eerie:)  This is made from 6x7 negative from 2002
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
 |
« Reply #4011 on: December 15, 2012, 09:36:23 AM » |
Reply
|
Michael, you've wasted a good tit.
Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
degrub
|
 |
« Reply #4012 on: December 15, 2012, 10:38:08 AM » |
Reply
|
Rob, Glad to have you back
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kikashi
|
 |
« Reply #4015 on: December 15, 2012, 12:57:41 PM » |
Reply
|
No.
No! There's beauty and there's eerie. I prefer your beauty, Michael. Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
MichaelEzra
|
 |
« Reply #4016 on: December 15, 2012, 02:07:20 PM » |
Reply
|
Interesting, may be there is a problem with my English:) "Eerie" seems to be leading to an unintended course of perception. This is meant to be playful, weird, funny, strangely cute, not a fundamental tribute to beauty An alternate title candidate I have is simply "If".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
 |
« Reply #4017 on: December 16, 2012, 12:09:36 PM » |
Reply
|
Rob, Glad to have you back
Thank you! Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
 |
« Reply #4018 on: December 16, 2012, 12:15:16 PM » |
Reply
|
It needs four more hands to be a "mono-titted spider." I've often wondered about the ideal numerical configuration between hands and tits. Various options come to mind, but the opportunity for me to test theory against fact is as rare as, well, mono-titted spiders. What a life; one could take to drink. Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kikashi
|
 |
« Reply #4019 on: December 16, 2012, 12:23:18 PM » |
Reply
|
Interesting, may be there is a problem with my English:) "Eerie" seems to be leading to an unintended course of perception. This is meant to be playful, weird, funny, strangely cute, not a fundamental tribute to beauty An alternate title candidate I have is simply "If".
The problem's more likely to be with my perception than your English, I suspect. I find them weird but as far from "cute" as it's possible to be: unlike the rest of your work, they're just not my cup of tea. Jeremy
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|