|
Rob C
|
 |
« Reply #4300 on: January 29, 2013, 12:36:59 PM » |
 Reply
|
Well, ticked the little box and now reposted in place of the original pic.
Let's hope it makes a difference.
Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nick-T
|
|
« Reply #4301 on: January 29, 2013, 12:53:06 PM » |
Reply
|
Let's hope it makes a difference.
Rob C
It does  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
KLaban
|
|
« Reply #4302 on: January 29, 2013, 01:47:55 PM » |
Reply
|
Rob, it makes no difference if I tick the box or not, but whatever, you now have embedded metadata.
Hooray.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 29, 2013, 01:49:58 PM by KLaban »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #4303 on: January 29, 2013, 02:47:06 PM » |
Reply
|
Nick, Keith, Sean -
Thanks for helping me out - I hope my 'system' now works all the time!
;-)
Rob C (Happy Chappie).
P.S. One thing about that image, using Kodachrome (any tranny material, really) and the incident light metering system where you expose for the highlights certainly did hold the highlights in the white cloth pretty well. I realise this isn't news to pro viewers, but might help anybody else not used to incident light metering.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 29, 2013, 02:53:45 PM by Rob C »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SecondFocus
|
|
« Reply #4304 on: January 30, 2013, 08:25:28 PM » |
Reply
|
BC... Thank You! The additional photographs are truly great too! What cameras. bodies, backs, lenses did you use? And what was your lighting? Don't worry... yes I will try to steal your secrets but I am sure the results will not duplicate your results |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bcooter
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4306 on: January 31, 2013, 01:35:17 AM » |
Reply
|
Two images from a series repurposed, for editorial. Contaxt/Phase 1   BC |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
opgr
|
|
« Reply #4307 on: January 31, 2013, 02:34:10 AM » |
Reply
|
Finally! There is a colorspace problem (at least using Safari on Mac). The image seems to have Adobe RGB attached and looks fine when the profile is honored, but if I click the thumbnail, a new window opens where the image shows in horrible colors. Apparently the colorprofile isn't properly honored then. EDIT: it seems that the rather extensive EXIF data is reporting "uncalibrated" for colorspace. So, while the image has Adobe RGB attached, the EXIF colorspace apparently takes precedence… EDIT 2: The image I see on screen looks very similar to what I get if I *asign* ProPhoto to the original jpg. ? ? ? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 31, 2013, 06:31:34 AM by opgr »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
opgr
|
|
« Reply #4308 on: January 31, 2013, 02:38:34 AM » |
Reply
|
Two images from a series repurposed, for editorial.
You scared me! For a moment there I thought you were going all Hipstamatic on us… ;-) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bcooter
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4309 on: January 31, 2013, 02:42:39 AM » |
Reply
|
I am.
I'm just waiting for the Iphone 10, with 44 mpx, or the new Nikon F1, that doubles as a phone, mp3 player and watch.
BC
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
yaya
|
|
« Reply #4310 on: January 31, 2013, 03:30:48 AM » |
Reply
|
Kia ora,
This is one of a number of panorama's I took last Sunday for a client of mine.
Mauri ora
Simon
Very nice Simon! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
HarperPhotos
|
|
« Reply #4311 on: January 31, 2013, 11:32:33 AM » |
Reply
|
Thanks Yair.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bcooter
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4312 on: February 01, 2013, 04:43:42 AM » |
Reply
|
Just cleared embargo.  BC |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #4313 on: February 01, 2013, 10:43:27 AM » |
Reply
|
BC
As ever, nice work with a beautiful model. One of those rare moments when a girl looks as if she's just been poured into her skin, it fits her so well.
On top of that - or should that be below that? - I find myself drawn to the wet, reflective visual glamour going on around the feet and ankles: it's so beautifully textured, that sheen, that you feel you could touch it!
Rob C
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 01, 2013, 01:44:50 PM by Rob C »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jsch
|
|
« Reply #4314 on: February 01, 2013, 12:50:16 PM » |
Reply
|
Just cleared embargo.
...
Regarding your profile image. Be careful on top of that red ladder. Don't fall down with or without a camera in your hands. Best, Johannes |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bcooter
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4315 on: February 01, 2013, 01:36:46 PM » |
Reply
|
Regarding your profile image. Be careful on top of that red ladder. Don't fall down with or without a camera in your hands.
Best,
Johannes
Rob, Thanks for the kind words. Jsch There are a lot worse ways for a photographer to go than falling off a ladder, though I guess falling off a ladder looks pretty stupid in your bio. IMO BC |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ChristopherBarrett
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4316 on: February 01, 2013, 02:10:00 PM » |
Reply
|
Two images from a series repurposed, for editorial.
BC
Love these two, James. They remind me of the patina you would get on Type 52 or 55 if you didn't coat them and left them sitting out for a while. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bcooter
Guest
|
|
« Reply #4317 on: February 01, 2013, 02:14:29 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks CB. They are polarizing. Some people love them, some hate them . . . I love them so what the heck. BC |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Martin Ranger
|
|
« Reply #4318 on: February 01, 2013, 04:35:42 PM » |
Reply
|
Well, since it seems to be retro-Friday.  Fuji X-E1 (please don't shoot me ) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
