Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Hasselblad file workflow?  (Read 17098 times)
gss
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


« Reply #60 on: November 25, 2008, 07:22:48 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: David Grover / Hasselblad
Actually the majority of our users prefer to use FlexColor and now Phocus.  The loss in quality from going the DNG route is generally not acceptable.
I do hope you see the irony in this statement.
Logged
hcubell
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 730


WWW
« Reply #61 on: November 25, 2008, 09:55:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: gss
I do hope you see the irony in this statement.

The irony is escaping me. I happen to be one of those that has tried the DNG route for taking files through ACR and find the results notably lacking in quality compared to what I can get from Phocus(completely putting aside the issue of DAC). I hear the same basic complaint from many(most?) who shoot with Phase backs who compare the file rendering out of ACR/LR with C1.
Logged

David Grover / Phase One
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 967



WWW
« Reply #62 on: November 26, 2008, 02:53:43 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: gss
I do hope you see the irony in this statement.

No.


Logged

David Grover
Business Support and Development Manager, Software.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad