Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Adobe LR 2.3 available  (Read 14527 times)
mcbroomf
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 398


WWW
« on: January 23, 2009, 06:38:26 PM »
ReplyReply

http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Lightroom_2.3
Logged

Mike Broomfield
Website
DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2009, 07:11:47 PM »
ReplyReply

This is a 2.3 RC.  FYI.
Logged
Tam
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 39



WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2009, 02:19:29 PM »
ReplyReply

Works here on a Vista system, wimpy laptop. Major improvement in performance.
Logged
barryfitzgerald
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 606


« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2009, 04:37:18 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes a few things ironed out.
But not the base level NR..arrrggghhh.

Adobe release new motion picture

"ears wide shut" ;-)
Logged
pegelli
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 609



WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2009, 10:21:49 AM »
ReplyReply

For me it was a real improvement. Had several program crashes using 2.2 when doing local adjustments and then going on to edit in PS. That's all gone now.
« Last Edit: January 31, 2009, 10:22:19 AM by pegelli » Logged

pieter, aka pegelli
DaveCurtis
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 455


WWW
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2009, 08:12:20 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, It's a big improvement. I have finished "developing" 250 image without a single crash.

I must admit I found 2.2 rather disappointing with it's memory leaks.
Logged

jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3496



WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2009, 11:11:14 PM »
ReplyReply

I've had upgrading catalogue problems with 2.2 [on the Mac]. I wonder if 2.3 will help.
I wonder if software will ever be released that simply works with no bugs?
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4025



« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2009, 05:01:06 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: jjj
I've had upgrading catalogue problems with 2.2 [on the Mac]. I wonder if 2.3 will help.
I wonder if software will ever be released that simply works with no bugs?
Not a chance!

Proposition 1: all non-trivial programs have bugs.
Proposition 2: it is a sufficient criterion of program triviality that it have no bugs.

Jeremy
Logged
rdonson
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1420


WWW
« Reply #8 on: February 02, 2009, 09:23:15 AM »
ReplyReply

LR 2.2 consistently hung and crashed on three machines when using the brush (local adjustment).  RC 2.3 seems to perform better and we haven't seen a hang or a crash yet (fingers still crossed).

Looks like Adobe may be close to making V2 work.
Logged

[span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'][span style='font-family:Arial'][span style='font-family:Geneva'][span style='font-size:8pt;line-height:100%']Regards,
Ron[/span][/span][/span][/span]
Scooter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 2


« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2009, 04:43:24 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: rdonson
LR 2.2 consistently hung and crashed on three machines when using the brush (local adjustment).  RC 2.3 seems to perform better and we haven't seen a hang or a crash yet (fingers still crossed).

Looks like Adobe may be close to making V2 work.

I soooooooooo hope your right.  

I really like lightroom but v2.2 has been THE most unstable bit of software I've used in a long time.
Logged
Bartone
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 48


WWW
« Reply #10 on: February 06, 2009, 01:34:22 PM »
ReplyReply

I installed 2. awhile back and was thinking it was time for a new Mac. It ran so badly that I really couldn't do corrections without a huge delay for each click. 2.3 seems to have fixed that (so far). Mac G5 dual 2.7, OS 10.4, 6 gigs ram.

MUCH BETTER!
bartone
Logged
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6836


« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2009, 10:40:07 AM »
ReplyReply

On my old dual G5, with LR 2.2, Lightroom would crash a lot on files with local adjustments. The spinining cursor would spin for a long time then Lightroom crashed. Now, with Lightroom 2.3rc, those crashes are gone.
Logged

Francois
larkvi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 213



WWW
« Reply #12 on: February 08, 2009, 07:10:02 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: jjj
I've had upgrading catalogue problems with 2.2 [on the Mac]. I wonder if 2.3 will help.
I wonder if software will ever be released that simply works with no bugs?

2.3 fixed my catalogue upgrade problems on my mac.
Logged

Doyle Yoder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 500


« Reply #13 on: February 08, 2009, 11:16:19 AM »
ReplyReply

So Canon corrects their print drivers so that double profiling does not happen with LR2.2 and PSCS4 on Leopard, after all the fault was placed on the printer manufacture/drivers by Adobe and Apple.

So what happens LR2.3RC is released and causes the printer drivers to again default to double profiling. Forcing ColorSync again instead of No Correction.

WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG HERE?

Is this a f---ing game or what?

Are the Adobe programmers just that printer/CM challenged?

If you can't get any of this right, why not just do like ID and IL and lets us make our own choices in the printer driver. We don't need printing from PS and LR "IDIOT PROOFED" when choosing Application Manages Color.

You have really shown with the release of LR2.3RC who the real idiots are when it comes to printing with Application Manages Color.
« Last Edit: February 09, 2009, 03:57:12 PM by DYP » Logged
kaelaria
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2227



WWW
« Reply #14 on: February 08, 2009, 10:58:30 PM »
ReplyReply

WinXP here, no change from 2.2 but I had no issues with 2.2 either.  I just finished a 1500 pic edit from todays shoot, same speed, no problems.
Logged

jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3496



WWW
« Reply #15 on: February 09, 2009, 01:38:03 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: larkvi
2.3 fixed my catalogue upgrade problems on my mac.
What problems did you have?
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
stevebri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 166


« Reply #16 on: February 09, 2009, 03:40:50 PM »
ReplyReply

I run Vista 64 bit with 8G of ram....  I was nervous about this S/W when I bought my machine but it IS so reliable, better than any Mac system I've had or any PC stuff, even better than windows 2000.

Anyway, version 2.2 was solid for me and therefore a dream to use, it made me more money.

I often use a Mamiya ZD back and 2.2 opened the files with a green/yellow cast, not a problem but you don't need extra items in your workflow.

bottom line Lightroom 2.3 solved this and the colours are spot on...  

Thanks Adobe for listening...again


S
Logged
JDClements
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 312



WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 09, 2009, 05:14:21 PM »
ReplyReply

LR 2.2 has been very stable and problem-free on my Vista64 system with only 4 gigs. Therefore, I think I will wait for the official release before updating.
Logged

larkvi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 213



WWW
« Reply #18 on: February 11, 2009, 06:21:41 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: jjj
What problems did you have?

I had the same "cannot switch. . ." problem outlined in the other thread in this section--now, I have upgraded the relevant catalog and it works.

LR2.3 has introduced some new BS catalogue management, whereby only edited photos show up in my gallery browser after I export a photo, and this happens every time I export a photo (i.e. every day), and requires fiddling to get all the other photos back and properly sorted by star rating. I can't even imagine how they managed to get this behavior, which I cannot correct, but it is really annoying.
Logged

Victoria Bampton
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 38



WWW
« Reply #19 on: February 11, 2009, 06:26:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: larkvi
LR2.3 has introduced some new BS catalogue management, whereby only edited photos show up in my gallery browser after I export a photo, and this happens every time I export a photo (i.e. every day), and requires fiddling to get all the other photos back and properly sorted by star rating. I can't even imagine how they managed to get this behavior, which I cannot correct, but it is really annoying.

Are you sure that's a result of 2.3?  There were no catalog changes in 2.3.  Explain a little further?
Logged

Victoria
Download Lightroom Shortcuts List Free
Author of Adobe Lightroom - The Missing FAQ series
Pages: [1] 2 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad