Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Website review  (Read 1049 times)
rgs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 398



WWW
« on: February 24, 2009, 12:08:25 PM »
ReplyReply

I have just posted a major revision of my website, Richard Smith Photography. Opinions (and a little testing for those so inclined) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.


Richard Smith
www.myrsphoto.com
Logged

DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #1 on: February 24, 2009, 12:10:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Haven't had a chance to look much at it but on the first impressions front the first image displayed has Jpeg artifacts.
Logged
rgs
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 398



WWW
« Reply #2 on: February 24, 2009, 04:43:11 PM »
ReplyReply

I agree. I also thought that shot didn't look it's best. I think it must have been a third or fourth generation edit. The original is a 35mm Kodachrome (25) and I have now replaced the one on the first page with a new edit from a good scan of the chrome. See if you think it's improved. Thanks for you input.

RGS
Richard Smith Photography
Logged

DarkPenguin
Guest
« Reply #3 on: February 24, 2009, 05:13:39 PM »
ReplyReply

Better.

There are three pictures under galleries.  The third is not clickable.

Generally like the look.  A little tall for this monitor.  (Kind of in that no man's land of you have to scroll just enough to be irritating.)  I kind of wish the ordering and galleries bottom part would drop off when you drill down.

The site has 4 different looks (The main site, ordering, galleries and wedding galleries.) which means you can kind of lose track of the site you're visiting.

Overall nice.  Like the galleries.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad