Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Windows  (Read 2584 times)
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« on: April 02, 2009, 04:33:43 PM »
ReplyReply

[attachment=12689:NS_old_w..._ptxcopy.jpg]Taken in Nova Scotia and converted to BW. Yes the lines are not straight, but this aspect is minimal, I think. It is the aesthetic appeal that counts for me. Does the image evoke something, like nostalgia or something else?

JMR

Edit- I have added a colour version for anyone interested in comparing.

JMR
« Last Edit: April 29, 2009, 12:53:17 AM by John R » Logged
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 03, 2009, 12:48:02 AM »
ReplyReply

There are some good lines in the image, but the soft focus effect doesn't really work for me.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
dalethorn
Guest
« Reply #2 on: April 03, 2009, 04:52:06 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: John R
[attachment=12689:NS_old_w..._ptxcopy.jpg]Taken in Nova Scotia and converted to BW. Yes the lines are not straight, but this aspect is minimal, I think. It is the aesthetic appeal that counts for me. Does the image evoke something, like nostalgia or something else?
JMR

Yes. And it's quite good as is, but it could be extended to all sorts of ideas with an additional prop - something leaning against the wall, etc.
Logged
pegelli
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 581



WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 03, 2009, 05:40:09 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: wolfnowl
There are some good lines in the image, but the soft focus effect doesn't really work for me.

Mike.


I like the composition but I agree with wolfnowl. I think a gritty/grainy type conversion could work very well, as it will accentuate the texture in the weathered wood.
The soft focus is kind of counterintuitive vs. the rest of the picture.
Logged

pieter, aka pegelli
francois
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6731


« Reply #4 on: April 03, 2009, 07:12:24 AM »
ReplyReply

I'm with Mike and Pegelli, I don't think that the soft focus adds anything to your photo. The weathered wood and windows already create a sense of the past or nostalgia.
Logged

Francois
shothunter
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 37


WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 03, 2009, 02:35:47 PM »
ReplyReply

I agree with the soft focus not adding much to your photograph - but it doesn't keep me from liking the image, makes me curious as to what's behind the window...
Logged

"I never bracket (...), bracketing is a sign of insecurity, (...) it means you don't really know what you're doing..."
Ansel Adams, 1983 BBC Series
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #6 on: April 03, 2009, 05:46:10 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: wolfnowl
There are some good lines in the image, but the soft focus effect doesn't really work for me.

Mike.
Thanks for the comments. Don't know what to say. On other sites most people like it, even with the soft technique. After I tried it, I realized it conveyed a kind of nastalgia and mystery, which I wanted, so I went with the soft look. I know that you are reader of TOP (The Online Photographer), and you may recall Mike Johnson or someone else (? at least he wrote about it) did an experiment using images from masters. Many people wrote in wanting to correct their images in various ways, citing all sorts of rules or corrections they would make. Not that I want to be compared to the masters, but the point for me is, when an image is reasonably good, one either likes it for various reasons or not. I respect your opinion.

JMR
« Last Edit: April 03, 2009, 06:04:17 PM by John R » Logged
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #7 on: April 03, 2009, 05:48:34 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: dalethorn
Yes. And it's quite good as is, but it could be extended to all sorts of ideas with an additional prop - something leaning against the wall, etc.
Thanks for the comments, Dale. Of course I was on Holiday and not shooting with props in mind. I was just drawn to the windows and the shack and the wood and surrounding wildflowers.

JMR
Logged
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #8 on: April 03, 2009, 05:51:51 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: pegelli
I like the composition but I agree with wolfnowl. I think a gritty/grainy type conversion could work very well, as it will accentuate the texture in the weathered wood.
The soft focus is kind of counterintuitive vs. the rest of the picture.
Your point is taken, however, I will submit the grainy, gritty look is not the only possible one in this scene. I did show this image for years as a straight shot of windows, but realized the window through windows evoked much more, at least to me. Thanks for the comments, much appreciated.

JMR
Logged
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #9 on: April 03, 2009, 05:54:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: francois
I'm with Mike and Pegelli, I don't think that the soft focus adds anything to your photo. The weathered wood and windows already create a sense of the past or nostalgia.
Thanks, Francois. I can only ask that you look at my pevious explanations. Your way of seeing the image is totally legimate as far as I am concerned. It's just that I chose a different way of looking at the scene.

JMR
Logged
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2009, 05:56:55 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: shothunter
I agree with the soft focus not adding much to your photograph - but it doesn't keep me from liking the image, makes me curious as to what's behind the window...
Thanks for the commentary. If interested, please see my other replies. As far I am concerned, there is no better version, just what one prefers, and each is legimate in its own right, at least, IMO.

JMR
Logged
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2009, 01:14:26 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: John R
Thanks for the comments. Don't know what to say. On other sites most people like it, even with the soft technique. After I tried it, I realized it conveyed a kind of nastalgia and mystery, which I wanted, so I went with the soft look. I know that you are reader of TOP (The Online Photographer), and you may recall Mike Johnson or someone else (? at least he wrote about it) did an experiment using images from masters. Many people wrote in wanting to correct their images in various ways, citing all sorts of rules or corrections they would make. Not that I want to be compared to the masters, but the point for me is, when an image is reasonably good, one either likes it for various reasons or not. I respect your opinion.

JMR

Hi John:  It was just a critique, not a criticism!  Go with what speaks to you!!

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
John R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1022


« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2009, 06:03:52 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: wolfnowl
Hi John:  It was just a critique, not a criticism!  Go with what speaks to you!!

Mike.
Ok Mike, I see your point.

JMR
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad