Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Anyone see these?  (Read 8853 times)
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« on: April 28, 2009, 12:44:18 PM »
ReplyReply

PDN and other places posted these from Mark Leibowitz http://www.pdnphotooftheday.com/2009/04/1112

I like em. Any ideas on what he did here?
Logged
andyptak
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 240


« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2009, 04:45:57 PM »
ReplyReply

I love them. Wouldn't mind getting a print.
Logged
Anthony R
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 252


« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2009, 07:59:06 PM »
ReplyReply

I guess we are the only two here who like them. I'd like a print too. Now which one..
Logged
ddk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 274


WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2009, 08:25:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Anthony R
I guess we are the only two here who like them. I'd like a print too. Now which one..


No, I like them too, just couldn't answer your question about how they were made.
Logged

david
-----------------------
www.pbase.com/ddk
JonasYip
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 41


« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2009, 11:23:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Anthony R
I like em. Any ideas on what he did here?

Looks like it's just a dragged shutter with multiple flash pops, camera handheld and moving.

I like them, too.

Logged

jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541



WWW
« Reply #5 on: May 04, 2009, 10:30:26 PM »
ReplyReply

That's how one way that I've done shots like that. Though multiple exposures on film can be very similar.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
Snook
Guest
« Reply #6 on: June 03, 2009, 11:50:45 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: jjj
That's how one way that I've done shots like that. Though multiple exposures on film can be very similar.

I remember in the film days you had to stop down a couple of stops after every exposure?
Would this be true today you think?
Do you guys think these were done with just multiple pops at same exposure?
Nice shots. I know some guys that do the same in post but it is never like doing it for real.
Thanks for the info.
Snook
Logged
jjj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3541



WWW
« Reply #7 on: June 09, 2009, 07:26:28 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Snook
I remember in the film days you had to stop down a couple of stops after every exposure?
Would this be true today you think?
Do you guys think these were done with just multiple pops at same exposure?
Depends on how it is done and what the background is and finally how much overlap you have of content.
Logged

Tradition is the Backbone of the Spineless.   Futt Futt Futt Photography
kernix
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


WWW
« Reply #8 on: August 20, 2009, 01:08:53 PM »
ReplyReply

I was going to suggest that it was multiple exposures. And I agree that mults should only be done for "real" with film, not with layers in PS.
Logged

James Kernicky
JFK-Photo
dalethorn
Guest
« Reply #9 on: August 20, 2009, 01:30:12 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: kernix
I was going to suggest that it was multiple exposures. And I agree that mults should only be done for "real" with film, not with layers in PS.

If you shoot with film, underexpose, and vary the angle and distance slightly, you can actually layer up the films and get some interesting effects. Might work better with positives than negatives.  Back in the early days of NDT, before the modern 3D airport-type scanners, that's how we could see through objects for real. You'd need something more powerful than Photoshop to do that with multiple digital exposures.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad