Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Warming Polarizer or Neutral  (Read 3012 times)
kuau
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 177


WWW
« on: May 30, 2009, 02:59:47 PM »
ReplyReply

In the market for a 77mm Polarizing Filter for my Sony A900 / CZ 16-35mm and Cz 24-70mm lens.
I shoot mostly now in Northern Arizona, I have been looking at the following filters:
Hoya 77mm (Moose) Warm Circular Polarizer Glass Filter
Singh-Ray LB Warming Polarizer
Sing-Ray LB Neutral Polarizer
or..
Sony's CZ T* Polarizer.

Any thoughts?

Steven
Logged

__________________________________________________________________________
Sinar arTec, Leaf Aptus II 7 AFI, 35, 70, 135mm Sinaron lenses,  HP Z3200 PS Printer
Jonathan Wienke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5759



WWW
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2009, 01:46:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Warming polarizers are completely unnecessary if shooting digital.

I use B+W myself, but the Singh-Ray are supposed to be good also.
Logged

Paul Sumi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1217


« Reply #2 on: June 02, 2009, 02:10:27 PM »
ReplyReply

I bought the Singh-Ray LB Warming Polarizer when it first came out.  It is very subtle, adding a touch of warmth to the blues in shadows but not obvious overall.  I haven't used it on wider than 24mm on a FF camera, so don't know if you 'll need the thin-ring version for your 16-35.

One nice thing about the LB is that it is "brighter" by 2/3rds stop than S-R's original polo filter.

It's been used in the eastern Sierra, southwest red rock country and Great Smoky Mountains.

No opinion on the neutral version, I haven't used it or seen it used yet.

Paul
« Last Edit: June 02, 2009, 02:13:46 PM by PaulS » Logged

Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad