Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Red3k vs. 5dMKII vs. GH1  (Read 5581 times)
heinrichvoelkel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368


« on: August 11, 2009, 04:41:29 AM »
ReplyReply

Michael posted the link in the "whats new" section...in case you missed it...great comparison....enjoy

click here
Logged
ustein
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #1 on: August 11, 2009, 08:17:54 PM »
ReplyReply

Why interesting?

Do you think you can make any(??) judgment based on this video? I can't.

Uwe
Logged

---------------------
http://www.outbackprint.com/
heinrichvoelkel
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 368


« Reply #2 on: August 12, 2009, 07:19:11 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: ustein
Why interesting?

Do you think you can make any(??) judgment based on this video? I can't.

Uwe

Hallo Uwe,

pretty simple, I'm quite astonished by the quality of the gh1 in relation to the 4times bigger chip of the canon ( just to name one thing).

I'm not sure which judgement I should make ( or you would like me to make) but the one thing I see is, that canon and the panasonic produce a quality good enough to make them useful tools.

the rest has to be testet by everybody for themselves...
« Last Edit: August 12, 2009, 07:19:57 AM by heinrichvoelkel » Logged
rcdurston
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 178



WWW
« Reply #3 on: August 12, 2009, 08:21:45 AM »
ReplyReply

Here is the link.
I think it tells you a tonne.
Red and Canon are amazing in low light, Canon a bit better. Image quality from the Panasonic is pretty except there seems to be some jumpiness and stutters to the frames.
The Panasonic still needs a lense adapter worth $2500 to get the ball rolling; so that giving you a $4k camera versus the Canon at $2700, the Canon is still football fields away in quality per dollar ratio.
The Red is just in a different level all together.
Logged

Morgan_Moore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2220


WWW
« Reply #4 on: August 12, 2009, 08:25:29 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: rcdurston
The Panasonic still needs a lense adapter worth $2500 to get the ball rolling;

err I thought the 14 kit lens was pretty good and you can attach a whole range of DSRL primes with a $20 adapter can you not?

and, horror of horrors the kits lens has AF !

S
Logged

Sam Morgan Moore Cornwall
www.sammorganmoore.com -photography
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4896



« Reply #5 on: August 12, 2009, 10:44:49 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: rcdurston
Here is the link.
The Panasonic still needs a lense adapter worth $2500 to get the ball rolling; so that giving you a $4k camera versus the Canon at $2700, the Canon is still football fields away in quality per dollar ratio.

Huh?

Lens adaptors for the GH1, for everything from Leica M to Nikon, are under $200. What are you talking about?

Michael
Logged
Morgan_Moore
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2220


WWW
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2009, 11:07:03 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: michael
Huh?

Lens adaptors for the GH1, for everything from Leica M to Nikon, are under $200. What are you talking about?

Michael

He's talking about adapters to use with PL mount cinema prime lenses or suchlike

(which is what is used in that reel)

Those lenses do have advantage in 'pulling focus' etc

S
Logged

Sam Morgan Moore Cornwall
www.sammorganmoore.com -photography
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4896



« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2009, 11:48:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Ahha.

While true that the RED and some Epic and Scarlet models will take PL lenses directly, these lenses are very expensive to begin with, so the cost of an adaptor is the least of one's worries. A basic kit of 7 Panavision (Zeiss) PL primes is about $35,000, so the adaptor cost isn't much of an issue for anyone for whom this is of more than academic interest.

And as for the Canon, it can't even take a PL mount adaptor, so the point is moot.

Michael
Logged
ustein
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 30


« Reply #8 on: August 12, 2009, 05:48:45 PM »
ReplyReply

My problem was that the scenes I liked (more the darker ons) we not available with the GH1. Also the scenes were very short.

Looks like the same people plan to do more. The good thing is that they seen to be professionals.

Uwe
Logged

---------------------
http://www.outbackprint.com/
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad