Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Major sRAW1>DNG bug  (Read 8556 times)
madmanchan
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2110


« Reply #20 on: October 20, 2009, 08:20:13 PM »
ReplyReply

There should be no difference in size between DNGs produced by Camera Raw, Lightroom, and DNG Converter, as long as you are using the equivalent versions of each (e.g., 5.5 for CR and DNG Converter, 2.5 for LR). If you are seeing differences, then it is most likely due to a difference in the DNG conversion options, as Scott suggested.
Logged

Scott Martin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1312


WWW
« Reply #21 on: October 21, 2009, 10:06:11 AM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Per Zangenberg
No, the sRAW1 files are a LOT bigger when converted.
Yes, that's what this thread is all about. I was responding to mpenny's comment about her RAW files (not sRAW files) getting larger when converted to DNG, which is surely due to her conversion preferences. Cheers.
Logged

Per Zangenberg
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 46


« Reply #22 on: October 21, 2009, 12:36:37 PM »
ReplyReply

Quote from: Onsight
Yes, that's what this thread is all about. I was responding to mpenny's comment about her RAW files (not sRAW files) getting larger when converted to DNG, which is surely due to her conversion preferences. Cheers.

arh ok sorry, you are right that the regular RAW files should not get bigger.
Logged
McLeonard
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1


« Reply #23 on: October 28, 2009, 07:47:13 AM »
ReplyReply

Pixels don't have all three components; neighboring pixels share channels.


Regards

McLeonard

____
dossier surendettement
Logged
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad