|
Ed Blagden
|
 |
« on: October 15, 2009, 01:58:21 AM » |
Reply
|
Hello all,
I am off to camp at the eastern edge of the Rift Valley next week, and the scenery there just cries out for panoramics. However I have never shot panoramics before and I wonder if anyone could point me in the direction of any good "how to" advice. I shoot with a 5D and have a tripod with ballhead setup. Specifically:
- Which type of lenses are best - wide, tele, or standard 50mm? - Exposure techniques - I assume this should be done manually, each shot with the same settings, using ETTR? - Panning technique - do I have to keep the horizon in the middle of the frame? - What software? I have LR2.5, I don't have Photoshop (and nor am I going to get it just for this), and somewhere I have a CD for something called Photostitch which came with my 5D. Is this any good? - What is the best editing workflow?
I'd appreciate any pointers. Thanks!
Ed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BernardLanguillier
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2009, 02:35:02 AM » |
Reply
|
Hello all,
I am off to camp at the eastern edge of the Rift Valley next week, and the scenery there just cries out for panoramics. However I have never shot panoramics before and I wonder if anyone could point me in the direction of any good "how to" advice. I shoot with a 5D and have a tripod with ballhead setup. Specifically:
- Which type of lenses are best - wide, tele, or standard 50mm? On a 5D, I would say that a 60-70 mm lens is often a good comprise for general pano work. Lack of light fall should be a high priority in selecting such a lens. - Exposure techniques - I assume this should be done manually, each shot with the same settings, using ETTR? Indeed. - Panning technique - do I have to keep the horizon in the middle of the frame? Parallax will be a problem if you have near objects in the frame and simply shoot with a regular head. Panoramic heads make it possible to locate the camera on top of the nodal point of the lens for parallax free shooting. They will also enable you to point up or down without tilting the camera left or right which will reduce problems. Without one of these, position you tripod in such a way that the based supporting the head is horizontal, then rotate using the rotating based of your head if you have one. - What software? I have LR2.5, I don't have Photoshop (and nor am I going to get it just for this), and somewhere I have a CD for something called Photostitch which came with my 5D. Is this any good? Mostly crap, Autopano pro is the best option for somebody like you. - What is the best editing workflow? Shoot -> convert from raw to tiff in your normal raw conversion software -> autopano pro for pano work -> you typical retouching app for final re^touch. One quick sample for the road...  Regards, Bernard
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
A few images online here!
|
|
|
|
Photo Op
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2009, 05:30:57 AM » |
Reply
|
Hello all,
- What software? I have LR2.5, I don't have Photoshop (and nor am I going to get it just for this), and somewhere I have a CD for something called Photostitch which came with my 5D. Is this any good? I'd appreciate any pointers. Thanks!
Ed Ed- check this out for the Mac. http://www.arcsoft.com/public/software_tit...&dyContent=--Dave
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
David
|
|
|
|
|
|
ErikKaffehr
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 15, 2009, 07:29:49 AM » |
Reply
|
Hi, I hope you enjoy your trip! Se response below Best regards Erik Hello all, I am off to camp at the eastern edge of the Rift Valley next week, and the scenery there just cries out for panoramics. However I have never shot panoramics before and I wonder if anyone could point me in the direction of any good "how to" advice. I shoot with a 5D and have a tripod with ballhead setup. Specifically: - Which type of lenses are best - wide, tele, or standard 50mm? Any that works. Beware of extreme wide angles - Exposure techniques - I assume this should be done manually, each shot with the same settings, using ETTR? Manual exposure may be safest but not necessarily optimal. If using ETTR it should be based on brightest part. - Panning technique - do I have to keep the horizon in the middle of the frame? It's easiest, but may not be necessary. Take extra picture left and right if tilting camera as the resulting image is hard to predict. - What software? I have LR2.5, I don't have Photoshop (and nor am I going to get it just for this), and somewhere I have a CD for something called Photostitch which came with my 5D. Is this any good? I use Autopano Pro, there are others. - What is the best editing workflow? I discuss this in my article: http://83.177.178.241/ekr/index.php/photoa...a-and-stitchingI'd appreciate any pointers. Thanks! Ed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Argerich
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 15, 2009, 08:35:35 AM » |
Reply
|
Same recommendations as Bernard's I'd add that unless shutter speed is not ok for handheld work you don't need a tripod. Shooting handheld or from a tripod without a pano head is exactly the same regarding the panoramic work as long as the shutter speed being used is ok for handheld operation. Make sure you overlap generously between shots, I'd say 30% or 40% this will help the pano software assemble the pano without many errors. Check Hugin as a free software option for pano work that is miles ahead of PS, if you want to buy something then PtGui pro, PtAssembler are also options.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Blagden
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 15, 2009, 09:21:00 AM » |
Reply
|
Thanks everybody - I really appreciate the guidance from people who so evidently know what they are talking about. If I remember I will post the resultant pano on this forum after I have gotten back from the Rift Valley. Same recommendations as Bernard's I'd add that unless shutter speed is not ok for handheld work you don't need a tripod. Shooting handheld or from a tripod without a pano head is exactly the same regarding the panoramic work as long as the shutter speed being used is ok for handheld operation. Make sure you overlap generously between shots, I'd say 30% or 40% this will help the pano software assemble the pano without many errors. Check Hugin as a free software option for pano work that is miles ahead of PS, if you want to buy something then PtGui pro, PtAssembler are also options. OK - my takeaway from this is that I don't have to be too anal about pano-heads etc provided my subject is in the distance (which it will be). Of course for landscapes I prefer to shoot on a tripod anyway for simple IQ reasons. I'll look at Hugin tonight before getting the credit card out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: October 15, 2009, 10:32:58 AM » |
Reply
|
Didn't see this mentioned, but since you asked - yes, don't forget to put your camera in Manual exposure mode, and use the same exposure settings for each image. If you're in A or S or P or... mode, you may end up with different exposures and this will definitely show up when you try to stitch the images together. Do a quick pan through the image to find out what the best exposure is without blowing out the highlights.
I have Hugin and I like it MOST of the time, but for difficult stitches I prefer Autopano Pro.
Mike.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 15, 2009, 10:34:37 AM by wolfnowl »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Luis Argerich
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: October 15, 2009, 10:37:14 AM » |
Reply
|
If you are on a non pano head tripod make sure to get an L bracket to shot in portrait orientation. (what a stupid tip ah?) Thanks everybody - I really appreciate the guidance from people who so evidently know what they are talking about. If I remember I will post the resultant pano on this forum after I have gotten back from the Rift Valley.
OK - my takeaway from this is that I don't have to be too anal about pano-heads etc provided my subject is in the distance (which it will be). Of course for landscapes I prefer to shoot on a tripod anyway for simple IQ reasons.
I'll look at Hugin tonight before getting the credit card out.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
markhout
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: October 15, 2009, 01:17:50 PM » |
Reply
|
Great tips all! Let me add manual focus to the list. And sometimes the dynamic range in the panorama is too large to capture. It would then make sense to bracket each shot - see my explanation here.Mark
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Panopeeper
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: October 15, 2009, 01:50:22 PM » |
Reply
|
1. My first advice is be careful with advices.
2. There are quite a few aspects of creating panoramas; they need to be understood, not to be learnt. I find it strange, that you did not make at least some tries of panoramas before going on such a trip.
3. Shooting each frame with the same setting and striving for ETTR are incompatible in most settings.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Gabor
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: October 15, 2009, 04:02:38 PM » |
Reply
|
Shooting each frame with the same setting and striving for ETTR are incompatible in most settings. True enough for some images, especially if shooting into the sun. As Mark suggested, bracketing is a good idea - PTGui and Autopano Pro for example will work with multiple exposures of each image. Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
ArunGaur
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 57
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: October 15, 2009, 11:46:51 PM » |
Reply
|
On a 5D, I would say that a 60-70 mm lens is often a good comprise for general pano work. Lack of light fall should be a high priority in selecting such a lens. Indeed. Parallax will be a problem if you have near objects in the frame and simply shoot with a regular head. Panoramic heads make it possible to locate the camera on top of the nodal point of the lens for parallax free shooting. They will also enable you to point up or down without tilting the camera left or right which will reduce problems. Without one of these, position you tripod in such a way that the based supporting the head is horizontal, then rotate using the rotating based of your head if you have one. Mostly crap, Autopano pro is the best option for somebody like you. Shoot -> convert from raw to tiff in your normal raw conversion software -> autopano pro for pano work -> you typical retouching app for final re^touch. One quick sample for the road...  Regards, Bernard It is always good to use pan head. Arun Gaur http://tripolia-indianlandscapeimages.com
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Blagden
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: October 16, 2009, 01:10:35 AM » |
Reply
|
1. My first advice is be careful with advices. True, but the trick is to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad. Better to ask and reject than not to ask at all. 2. There are quite a few aspects of creating panoramas; they need to be understood, not to be learnt. I find it strange, that you did not make at least some tries of panoramas before going on such a trip. Er, I think you missed the tense here. I'm going in a week from now. Future tense. Of course, I will do some test shots of garden, house etc before I go. I don't see what is so strange about asking advice from people who know before trying out a new technique. One has to start somewhere. 3. Shooting each frame with the same setting and striving for ETTR are incompatible in most settings. That's interesting. I would have thought that the thing to do would be to pick the individual frame with the highest highlights, find the ETTR exposure for that particular frame, and then use that manual exposure for each frame in the scene. In other words, ETTR for the whole scene.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: October 16, 2009, 02:22:35 AM » |
Reply
|
That's interesting. I would have thought that the thing to do would be to pick the individual frame with the highest highlights, find the ETTR exposure for that particular frame, and then use that manual exposure for each frame in the scene. In other words, ETTR for the whole scene. Yes, but if you're creating a panorma of a large area, especially if you're shooting into the sun, your 'proper' exposure can vary by more than five or six or eight stops. So if you set your exposure for the highlights in the brightest part of the scene, once you get out to the periphery you might find that your image is mostly black at that exposure. It's really scene dependent. Here's an example where I exposed for the clouds on the right, which kept some detail in the sunset on the left, but I had to let the foreground mountains drop to black. I didn't have time to bracket here because the light was changing so fast. [attachment=17241:DSCF5311_P.jpg] Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Blagden
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: October 16, 2009, 03:06:27 AM » |
Reply
|
Yes, but if you're creating a panorma of a large area, especially if you're shooting into the sun, your 'proper' exposure can vary by more than five or six or eight stops. So if you set your exposure for the highlights in the brightest part of the scene, once you get out to the periphery you might find that your image is mostly black at that exposure. It's really scene dependent. Here's an example where I exposed for the clouds on the right, which kept some detail in the sunset on the left, but I had to let the foreground mountains drop to black. I didn't have time to bracket here because the light was changing so fast.
Mike. Mike That's still a nice shot, even if the mountain is clipped... I would be interested to know the workflow if you do bracket. I understand that each panoramic should be assembled from shots taken at the same exposure. So do you make several panoramics from each of the bracket levels and then do some kind of HDR from the resulting set of panoramics? Thanks Ed
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
ErikKaffehr
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: October 16, 2009, 06:50:52 AM » |
Reply
|
Hi! That was the approach I used initally. Nowdays I often just shot on automatic. Modern stitchers can handle both approaches. You may try both! Best regards Erik True, but the trick is to be able to distinguish between the good and the bad. Better to ask and reject than not to ask at all.
Er, I think you missed the tense here. I'm going in a week from now. Future tense. Of course, I will do some test shots of garden, house etc before I go. I don't see what is so strange about asking advice from people who know before trying out a new technique. One has to start somewhere.
That's interesting. I would have thought that the thing to do would be to pick the individual frame with the highest highlights, find the ETTR exposure for that particular frame, and then use that manual exposure for each frame in the scene. In other words, ETTR for the whole scene.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: October 16, 2009, 10:36:56 AM » |
Reply
|
I would be interested to know the workflow if you do bracket. I understand that each panoramic should be assembled from shots taken at the same exposure. So do you make several panoramics from each of the bracket levels and then do some kind of HDR from the resulting set of panoramics? Depends on the software, but if you're using Autopano Pro for example, and let's say you've got nine images to stitch and 3 exposures of each, you just lump all 27 images together and let the software figure it out. Does a good job. Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Blagden
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: October 26, 2009, 01:42:27 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks everybody - I really appreciate the guidance from people who so evidently know what they are talking about. If I remember I will post the resultant pano on this forum after I have gotten back from the Rift Valley. OK, as promised (or should that be threatened?) I attach an attempt at a pano from the weekend. The original is a 37MP monster. [attachment=17510:Riftpano1_0000.jpg]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AndrewKulin
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: October 26, 2009, 05:23:49 PM » |
Reply
|
OK, as promised (or should that be threatened?) I attach an attempt at a pano from the weekend. The original is a 37MP monster.
[attachment=17510:Riftpano1_0000.jpg] Excellent job - I particularly love what is going on in the sky - the clouds, the rays, the rain showers in the distance. Andrew
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|