|
Alex MacPherson
|
 |
« on: October 19, 2009, 11:35:28 PM » |
Reply
|
I am using C1 4.8.3 as my raw converter for my Canon 5D. I recently notice quite a lot of noise in the shadow areas of my recent images. For a minute, I thought there was something wrong with my sensor that I had recently cleaned.
I went back and opened the images in ACR and there wasn't any noise where I had seen it in the C1 processed images.
What gives?! What am I doing wrong in C1? The images were properly exposed and there were no changes in exposure ect.
help!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
stewarthemley
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: October 20, 2009, 03:56:08 AM » |
Reply
|
I know you stated your problem was with C1 but had a similar problem with LR (essentially the same as ACR) and noisy images from a 5D2 at high ISO, anything above 1600. I tried Raw Developer and it was far better. You could try a free demo download to see if it's any better. (As it's fashionable to state full disclosure - I have no connection with RD other than as a satisfied user!)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
barryfitzgerald
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: October 22, 2009, 04:23:45 PM » |
Reply
|
C1 4 adds a lot of sharpening by default, have you tried reducing this or turning it off?
Obviously sharpening enhances noise, so if you are going to do some NR work on images, I would avoid any sharpening, or keep it to a minimal level. I have noticed, that even with sharpening off, C1 does seem to apply some anyway, this is one of the weak spots of the software IMO, but it's still very good, and right up there for details work.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tho_mas
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: October 23, 2009, 07:04:00 AM » |
Reply
|
I am using C1 4.8.3 as my raw converter for my Canon 5D. I recently notice quite a lot of noise do you use the actual RAW files or do you convert them to DNG prior to editing them in C1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Alex MacPherson
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2009, 05:14:21 AM » |
Reply
|
do you use the actual RAW files or do you convert them to DNG prior to editing them in C1? raw files only
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Doug Peterson
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: October 30, 2009, 06:43:16 PM » |
Reply
|
Speaking as an experienced user of both programs and a big lover of the 5DII for low-light high-ISO shots: C1 does a fantastic job of handling noise/grain/detail from the 5DII on high ISO shots. If you're not finding this I would uninstall Capture One and reinstall. Or, in case the issue is settings or expectations, perhaps you could post a raw file and we'll pitch in by processing and posting 100% crops from our various preferred convertors. Doug Peterson __________________ Head of Technical Services, Capture Integration Phase One, Leaf, Leica, Canon, Apple, Profoto, Eizo & More National: 877.217.9870 | Cell: 740.707.2183 Newsletter: Read Latest or Sign Up RSS Feed: Subscribe
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 31, 2009, 04:29:25 PM by dougpetersonci »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Jack Flesher
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: October 30, 2009, 11:13:39 PM » |
Reply
|
Stupid question, but what ISO were the 5D files and what NR settings did you have set in C1?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
marcmccalmont
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: October 31, 2009, 07:12:41 AM » |
Reply
|
Try turning off sharpening and then use a sharpening filter during post processing On High ISO 5DII shots I like first selecting shadows then running noiseware pro (weak noise) Then as a second step sharpening the inverted selection with focus fixer (.7 to .9) Hope this helps Marc
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Marc McCalmont
|
|
|
rsonia
Newbie
Offline
Posts: 5
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 03, 2009, 09:40:12 AM » |
Reply
|
In preferences under color if it is set to Perceptual, try setting to Relative Colorimetric. Don't know why, but it makes a difference...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
rovanpera
Jr. Member

Offline
Posts: 62
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 14, 2009, 07:59:17 AM » |
Reply
|
I am using C1 4.8.3 as my raw converter for my Canon 5D. I recently notice quite a lot of noise in the shadow areas of my recent images. For a minute, I thought there was something wrong with my sensor that I had recently cleaned.
I went back and opened the images in ACR and there wasn't any noise where I had seen it in the C1 processed images.
What gives?! What am I doing wrong in C1? The images were properly exposed and there were no changes in exposure ect.
help! C1 adds fine noise to all images, are you referring to that? It also does some color NR when the slider is at 0...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
N Walker
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 14, 2009, 08:21:59 AM » |
Reply
|
I recently notice quite a lot of noise in the shadow areas of my recent images. For a minute, I thought there was something wrong with my sensor that I had recently cleaned.
I went back and opened the images in ACR and there wasn't any noise where I had seen it in the C1 processed images.
What gives?! What am I doing wrong in C1? The images were properly exposed and there were no changes in exposure ect.
help![/quote]
If you turn off noise reduction in Phase One and ACR, Phase One is noisier. With noise reduction settings at default CI uses higher noise reduction algorithms. I purchased Phase One several years ago because it was vastly superior to earlier versions of ACR (large blotchy RGB artefacts in the shadows for one). Phase One's colours out of the box were also superior until Tom Fors ACR calibrator tool appeared and ACR offered camera calibration setting inputs.
For one off red label images I use RPP as it superior to all other RAW converters (though the UI is not for the feint hearted or speed and sucks) - it joins up the dots and holds noticeably more subtle details. All of my comparisons are made with all sharpening and micro contrast options turned off between converters - although who knows what is being injected into the coding at default with some converters.
Phase One is over hyped from bygone days and its superiority in today's RAW converter market is a myth.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: November 14, 2009, 08:48:04 AM by Nick Walker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|