|
Slobodan Blagojevic
|
 |
« Reply #600 on: April 28, 2012, 02:39:38 PM » |
 Reply
|
Nicely seen Ken, and processed with restrain.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
armand
|
|
« Reply #601 on: April 28, 2012, 03:02:29 PM » |
Reply
|
in NM
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chris Calohan
|
|
« Reply #602 on: April 29, 2012, 07:55:24 AM » |
Reply
|
A nice marriage of organic and inorganic shapes, textures and materials...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
What! Me Worry?
|
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #604 on: May 01, 2012, 02:03:12 AM » |
Reply
|
Thanks for sharing your work, folks! Here are a couple of images Marcia shot with her cell phone back in March - both taken at Butchart Gardens (I pushed them around a little in LR4) Mike.   |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 25, 2012, 01:14:47 AM by wolfnowl »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #605 on: May 01, 2012, 03:19:41 AM » |
Reply
|
Marcia's second one is quite spectacular!
Whilst 'pushing them around' you might have taken off the gnome's hat!
;-)
Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Bill
|
|
« Reply #606 on: May 01, 2012, 03:19:36 PM » |
Reply
|
I can imagine a really nice B&W reworking of that second shot, with a fairly strong vignetting to really pick out the tree
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #607 on: May 01, 2012, 11:27:47 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks, folks! I think the gnome was camera shy and took it on the lam, Rob. Bill, I hadn't considered B&W but it might be worth it.
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jule
|
|
« Reply #610 on: May 26, 2012, 07:28:10 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks for sharing your work, folks! Here are a couple of images Marcia shot with her cell phone back in March - both taken at Butchart Gardens (I pushed them around a little in LR4) Mike. Crazy trees... Just love them !!! Julie |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
jule
|
|
« Reply #611 on: May 26, 2012, 07:30:28 PM » |
Reply
|
I just can't get enough of them trees... Here are some more from my monochrome photo library. Regards, Holger www.broschek-photo.comLove the last one Holger. It has such a dynamic feel to it. Julie |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #612 on: May 27, 2012, 01:35:34 AM » |
Reply
|
Crazy trees... Just love them !!!
Julie
Thanks for saying so! I'll pass that along to Marcia. Mike. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tony Jay
|
|
« Reply #613 on: May 27, 2012, 01:55:02 AM » |
Reply
|
Lovely shot of the meadow - the light just shows one everything that is good about it.
Regards
Tony Jay
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #614 on: May 28, 2012, 12:30:15 AM » |
Reply
|
Indeed! Russ would disagree  but I'd remove about 1/4 of the foreground off the bottom as I don't think the green grassy area adds much but I like the stalks that fall behind that. Mike. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #615 on: May 28, 2012, 12:35:08 AM » |
Reply
|
A couple of recent works. The top one is a bit of cell phone camera fun. I did a similar one a while back of a different garry oak, and the scene here suggested a similar treatment.
The bottom one is from a local park that I've been meaning to visit for a while. We were there yesterday. It's not a great image, but the white flowers belong to what is by far the largest rhododendron I've ever seen. By comparison, the fence is about 3' 6" (just over 1 metre). Truth be told this isn't one tree but about six or seven. Still, it's quite impressive.
Mike.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: May 28, 2012, 12:40:18 AM by wolfnowl »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #616 on: May 28, 2012, 03:22:13 AM » |
Reply
|
I like the top one; it's a treatment that makes photography something more than just a record of what's there and, better, makes it something twice as interesting. Oh well, it's still early... but I do like the photograph!
Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #618 on: May 28, 2012, 12:20:57 PM » |
Reply
|
The top one is interesting. If you rotate 90 degrees clockwise, it seems you are about to be in a gunfight....draw... How odd: I just followed your instructions, and what I saw was a suspender belt. Are you sure you're not on sedatives or, more damaging yet, beta-blockers? Rob C |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
