|
EduPerez
|
 |
« Reply #620 on: May 29, 2012, 08:03:25 AM » |
 Reply
|
I'll agree with the rest: number one is very nice... and proves again that the photographer is more important than the tool.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #621 on: May 31, 2012, 12:33:46 AM » |
Reply
|
Thanks, folks! I like to think the photographer and the camera work together.  Mike. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muntanela
|
|
« Reply #622 on: May 31, 2012, 09:13:13 AM » |
Reply
|
I love birches and larches and (fanatically...) the Valtelline valley.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #623 on: June 01, 2012, 01:00:52 AM » |
Reply
|
Thanks for sharing your work. Perhaps ironically, I'd prefer the first one w/o the bright yellow tree taking up half the foreground, and only a quiet greenspace of firs with the occasional dab of yellow from the birch in the background and the light. YMMV!
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muntanela
|
|
« Reply #624 on: June 01, 2012, 04:03:09 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks for your analysis. I have the same feelings as yours about this image of some years ago... What does it mean "w/o" and "YMMV!" ?
Excuse my poor, barbaric English...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman Bill
|
|
« Reply #625 on: June 01, 2012, 04:25:22 PM » |
Reply
|
w/o = without
YMMV = Your mileage may vary (in other words, you might not agree)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #626 on: June 01, 2012, 09:00:54 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks, Bill. I forgot that not all members have netspeak as a first (second, third...) language.
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
muntanela
|
|
« Reply #627 on: June 02, 2012, 03:39:04 AM » |
Reply
|
w/o = without
YMMV = Your mileage may vary (in other words, you might not agree)
Ah! Then I don't agree, let's put the thing so: we agree at 50%...  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
kikashi
|
|
« Reply #628 on: June 02, 2012, 10:04:05 AM » |
Reply
|
I love birches and larches and (fanatically...) the Valtelline valley.
They're all good. I see Mike's point about the first. My favourite is the second, though. Jeremy |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
sierraman
Jr. Member
 Offline
Posts: 79
|
|
« Reply #629 on: June 02, 2012, 08:36:52 PM » |
Reply
|
Yosemite Valley Ponderosa Pines
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #632 on: July 12, 2012, 02:53:04 AM » |
Reply
|
In a class of their own, Tom.
Rob C
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rob C
|
|
« Reply #633 on: July 12, 2012, 02:56:18 AM » |
Reply
|
And to think that they forgot the Tree of Hope, the most important tree that there is after the chemical saviour genre. Rob C |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mjollnir
|
|
« Reply #634 on: July 12, 2012, 11:57:02 AM » |
Reply
|
lulz. I grew up with #6 which, while beautiful, is more famous for being a corporate logo than anything else. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
tom b
|
|
« Reply #635 on: July 12, 2012, 12:21:10 PM » |
Reply
|
I would have thought the Bodhi Tree, Bodhgaya would have been on the list. Cheers, |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #636 on: July 12, 2012, 02:06:27 PM » |
Reply
|
Thanks for the link!
Here's a shot from Marcia and one from me. Both bigleaf maples, both processed with an 'orton effect'.
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Mjollnir
|
|
« Reply #637 on: July 13, 2012, 09:37:05 AM » |
Reply
|
Just not sure if I like the processing on this one or not; it's a B&W convo, and one of about 30 I took of this beautiful sandbar in the Merced River just 200m west of Swinging Bridge. It's too 'something'.  Frozen Beach, Merced River by tanngrisnir3, on Flickr |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
wolfnowl
|
|
« Reply #639 on: July 14, 2012, 01:59:17 AM » |
Reply
|
Love the first one, Julie!!
Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
