If you have time try to develop a Sinar raw file with Exposure, then use Raw Photo Processor... I have discovered a huge difference in quality and sharpness! RPP is right now the better... a bit difficult to use but great.
Roberto made this observation in another LL forum thread here
. When I followed up on his advice to try RPP to convert raw .dng files I was quite astonished!!
So much so that I am much happier for my eMotion 75 back than I was an hour ago.
I didn't see a specific profile on the RPP website for Sinar MFDB -- even though the RPP program did open copies of the unprocessed original .ia files -- but I also found the real improvement was immediately apparent when opening the .dng files already converted by eXposure, so appreciate this tip.
I don't know much about this subject at all so was quite interested to read the information in the FAQ section of the RPP website here Why my Raw files look underexposed (dark, gray veiled) in RPP compared to other converters?
It seems to my uneducated eyes that there is quite a difference between the raw files opened up in eXposure using the eMotion 75 profile and the darker files that appear when the same .dng files are opened up in RPP.
Now why is that?