You were offended by Anders' images ...
Guess what? I'm sure plenty of people were offended by your holier-than-thou response to his images.
Your own reaction says more about you than the issue at hand ... as does mine.
Funny how that works.
It was obvious you were offended by my response.. but you didn't say way. Classifying it without saying specifically why (as I did with Anders images) is useless. I took the time to explain specifically and gave examples and I wasn't rude or impolite in the process. You, are just letting your emotions out. And I don't find it funny (or useful) at all. But I do find it common on these subjects.
Saying what specifically bothers you would be helpful. Maybe more to you than me.
I find speaking for others is most often fraught with delusions. Others speak for themselves as they have in this thread. Perhaps in the future you can stick with what you feel and not try and channel others?
Do you mind me asking you a few questions?
Have you any experience with the subject? At least past taking zoo pictures?
Are you always so rude and hostile? Or is the subject matter giving you those feelings and you can't control your emotions? I ask this because it really is hard to control your emotions when you see this sort of thing first hand. Most feel powerless, impotent, like there's nothing they can do to help. I want to understand your rudeness and anger. You see, all I did was politely explain why I 'felt' the way I did about certain types of images. I did it without name calling, labeling, or rudeness. Don't get me wrong, when it comes to other subjects I'm just as capable as you've demonstrated with going over the top concerning decorum. I just don't think it's warranted here.
Perhaps if you try to form meaningful answers to my questions your anger will diminish.. perhaps it will increase your understanding. Perhaps not.