Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: 1936 Packard  (Read 1153 times)
sailronin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 255



WWW
« on: October 23, 2010, 07:19:09 PM »
ReplyReply



HN 501CM with 50mm Distagon and Fuji 160 pro film
Logged

Thank you for looking, comments and critiques are always welcome.
Dave

http://sailronin.smugmug.com
Dick Roadnight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1730


« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2010, 01:46:04 AM »
ReplyReply

HN 501CM with 50mm Distagon and Fuji 160 pro film
Nice shot of the mascot, shame about the car.

A Flexbody would allow you to use tilt and get the car and mascot in focus. (I will be getting a CF50 which I will be able to use with my Flexbody)
Logged

Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #2 on: October 24, 2010, 04:19:45 AM »
ReplyReply

Why would you want the car to be crisp? It would distract from the subject, the hood ornament.

Very nice, tactile, feeling to the image.

Rob C
Logged

Dick Roadnight
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1730


« Reply #3 on: October 24, 2010, 04:38:54 AM »
ReplyReply

Why would you want the car to be crisp? It would distract from the subject, the hood ornament.

Very nice, tactile, feeling to the image.

Rob C
Judging by the title, the car was supposed to be the subject!
Logged

Hasselblad H4, Sinar P3 monorail view camera, Schneider Apo-digitar lenses
sailronin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 255



WWW
« Reply #4 on: October 24, 2010, 06:11:09 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you Rob, that was the idea but I understand wanting to see more of this beautiful machine.
Dick, sorry about the false advertising, more of the car is below  Grin



Here's more of the car, Shot with M8 and 24mm Elmar


HB 501CM and 50mm Distagon Fuji 160 pro film
« Last Edit: October 24, 2010, 06:39:52 AM by sailronin » Logged

Thank you for looking, comments and critiques are always welcome.
Dave

http://sailronin.smugmug.com
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2804


« Reply #5 on: October 24, 2010, 06:27:36 AM »
ReplyReply

My initial reaction was the ornament was the focal point of the image and it would have been better to have moved to the left. If it was the car more should have been shown?
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #6 on: October 24, 2010, 11:38:52 AM »
ReplyReply

My initial reaction was the ornament was the focal point of the image and it would have been better to have moved to the left. If it was the car more should have been shown?


Ah, but you need the extreme darkness of the folded hood to posterize the mascot.

Rob C
Logged

wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5791



WWW
« Reply #7 on: October 24, 2010, 03:27:42 PM »
ReplyReply

I found that I looked past the mascot to the folded hood, then wondered why half the image was OOF background that held no interest.  A different position might have highlighted the mascot better.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
popnfresh
Guest
« Reply #8 on: October 24, 2010, 07:54:03 PM »
ReplyReply

I like these, but then I'm a sucker for detail shots of vintage cars.  Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad