Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Nymph at Tregoose  (Read 1443 times)
John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« on: November 23, 2010, 06:02:03 AM »
ReplyReply

This was back in 1984, shot on a Rolleiflex 2.8F, on HP5.

I don't know whether she is still there or not - I hope so.

John
Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
GEOFFREYJAMES
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 80


« Reply #1 on: November 23, 2010, 07:30:51 AM »
ReplyReply

A sweet picture and one of those instances where shallow depth of field is necessary.  Where is Tregoose ?
Logged
John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« Reply #2 on: November 23, 2010, 07:36:25 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you, Geoffrey. Yes I think the Rollei would have been opened right up to f2.8 for this one. Tregoose is a little farm in mid-Cornwall, just north of where I live. In those days it was home to several donkeys and a herd of contrary goats.

John
Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
Christoph C. Feldhaim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2509


There is no rule! No - wait ...


« Reply #3 on: November 23, 2010, 07:57:31 AM »
ReplyReply

I like how the unsharp tree in the background echoes the shape of the nymph.
Nice composition.
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8301



WWW
« Reply #4 on: November 23, 2010, 08:02:32 AM »
ReplyReply

I like how the unsharp tree in the background echoes the shape of the nymph.
Nice composition.
+1

Eric
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5807



WWW
« Reply #5 on: November 23, 2010, 10:03:47 AM »
ReplyReply

Nicely done!

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
popnfresh
Guest
« Reply #6 on: November 23, 2010, 10:05:19 AM »
ReplyReply

A very nice shot. I like that it's B&W, and the tonality is beautiful. Color would not have been as evocative.
Logged
Riaan van Wyk
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 682



WWW
« Reply #7 on: November 23, 2010, 10:46:02 AM »
ReplyReply

A pleasing to the eye photo John. Everything here works so well together.   
Logged
JohnKoerner
Guest
« Reply #8 on: November 23, 2010, 05:01:05 PM »
ReplyReply

Very nice John ... ironic to me also because I am about to post a statue photo myself Smiley


.
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8301



WWW
« Reply #9 on: November 23, 2010, 06:53:47 PM »
ReplyReply

Nice, John.

I can't resist showing my own statue photo, from a few years ago in Italy (I think it was Florence).

Eric
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #10 on: November 24, 2010, 03:27:51 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you, Geoffrey. Yes I think the Rollei would have been opened right up to f2.8 for this one. Tregoose is a little farm in mid-Cornwall, just north of where I live. In those days it was home to several donkeys and a herd of contrary goats.
John


Living beside a beautiful girl locked in that particular position would make most of us contrary, whether donkeys or goats!

Rob C
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2010, 03:32:00 AM »
ReplyReply

Nice, John.

I can't resist showing my own statue photo, from a few years ago in Italy (I think it was Florence).

Eric



Just goes to show you that Italians also have a sense of humour beyond tv programmes about stripping housewives; on the other hand, maybe this one was just having a practice run for going to Venice in February. Or she was another illegal immigrant.

Regardless, good reporting!

Rob C
Logged

David Saffir
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 172


WWW
« Reply #12 on: November 25, 2010, 08:04:02 PM »
ReplyReply

You've got a good thing going here, with the two shapes side by side.

Depth of field is good, and your use of black and white, and texture, is top-notch.

The foreground figures tend to blend in with the background. Might be helpful to burn in the background, or dodge your main subject, or both, to create better separation. Otherwise, a very nice image.

David Saffir
GuruShots Photo Critique -  for more photo critique resources
Logged

John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2010, 02:14:23 AM »
ReplyReply

The foreground figures tend to blend in with the background. Might be helpful to burn in the background, or dodge your main subject, or both, to create better separation. Otherwise, a very nice image.

David

Yes, I struggled with that both in the darkroom and again now with the scan. The values of the figurine and the background are very close, too close for comfort. The main subject is dodged and has the contrast pushed a little, which helps. But I found that if I masked the subject and did much more separation that the end result looked unnatural and the mood was lost, at least to my eyes. The problem we have with this particular shot is that the picture should soften and lighten with distance to give depth to the view, with the darker, sharper edges and values to the foreground. But to separate the figure we would need to burn-in or darken the background barn, which has the effect of bringing it forward and compressing the perceived image depth in an unpleasant way. So in the end I compromised with this treatment.

John
« Last Edit: November 26, 2010, 02:34:49 AM by John R Smith » Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad