Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: WHY NOT VIDEO CROPPING ?  (Read 1038 times)
CharlesRamsey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 9


WWW
« on: December 31, 2010, 08:42:29 AM »
ReplyReply

Luminous Landscape is waxing poetic about Panasonic's video feature that uses just a portion on the image sensor. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_11_mode_revealed.shtml Why not use a larger portion of the sensor then crop the resulting video. This would allow you to remove image shake caused by camera movement. You could pick two frames and define the center of each frame the computer would then align the frames in between that would give the smoothest motion.
Logged
feppe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2907

Oh this shows up in here!


WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 31, 2010, 08:53:24 AM »
ReplyReply

Luminous Landscape is waxing poetic about Panasonic's video feature that uses just a portion on the image sensor. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_11_mode_revealed.shtml Why not use a larger portion of the sensor then crop the resulting video. This would allow you to remove image shake caused by camera movement. You could pick two frames and define the center of each frame the computer would then align the frames in between that would give the smoothest motion.

Since no one has gone public about this, all we have is speculation. Possible reasons:
  • Requires too much R&D expense to be developed
  • Custom chip(s) or added CPU speed required would push up the cost of camera too high, make the camera too big, heat it up faster, and/or consume too much power
  • Somebody else has patented the tech already, and it's too expensive to license <- my guess
  • Goes against Panasonic's philosophy of having IS in the lenses, not the body
Logged

michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4731



« Reply #2 on: December 31, 2010, 09:09:36 AM »
ReplyReply

Luminous Landscape is waxing poetic about Panasonic's video feature that uses just a portion on the image sensor. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_11_mode_revealed.shtml Why not use a larger portion of the sensor then crop the resulting video. This would allow you to remove image shake caused by camera movement. You could pick two frames and define the center of each frame the computer would then align the frames in between that would give the smoothest motion.

The simple answer is, that's not the way the technology works. Rather than my entering into a lengthy explanation and discussion here (likely beyond my technical knowledge in any event), I would suggest that you study up on how video is implemented, and the data rates and limitations of current ASICs and CODECs.

It's easy to say. "Why don't they", but it's also safe to assume that if they could, they would,

Michael
Logged
RFPhotography
Guest
« Reply #3 on: January 01, 2011, 07:24:44 AM »
ReplyReply

Luminous Landscape is waxing poetic about Panasonic's video feature that uses just a portion on the image sensor. http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/panasonic_gh2_11_mode_revealed.shtml Why not use a larger portion of the sensor then crop the resulting video. This would allow you to remove image shake caused by camera movement. You could pick two frames and define the center of each frame the computer would then align the frames in between that would give the smoothest motion.

What you're referring to seems to be basically what video deshaker filters do now.
Logged
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4731



« Reply #4 on: January 01, 2011, 09:07:06 AM »
ReplyReply

What you're referring to seems to be basically what video deshaker filters do now.

Very true. Now imagine doing this in real time while shooting. The processor demand would be enormous.

Michael
Logged
RFPhotography
Guest
« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2011, 01:02:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Absolutely, Michael. 

Maybe I misunderstood the original commet, but I wasn't sure if Charles was talking about doing it in camera or in post.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad