Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1] 2 3 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Lightroom 3.4 & Camera Raw 6.4 RC posted  (Read 10725 times)
Schewe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5427


WWW
« on: March 10, 2011, 03:33:10 PM »
ReplyReply

The RC's for Lightroom 3.4 and Camera Raw 6.4 have been released at Adobe.Labs.com
Logged
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2011, 06:13:42 PM »
ReplyReply

I don't know if anyone else has encountered this or not... (Windows 7 Home Premium, 32-bit)

Downloaded LR 3.4 RC, ACR 6.4 RC and DNG Converter 6.4 RC.  ACR and DNG Converter installed fine.  Tried to install Lightroom and Norton 360 says that the file is acting 'suspiciously' and deletes the file.  Deleted the .zip file.  Downloaded again.  Shut down... restarted... same thing.

I'm not saying that the file is a security risk, only that Norton 360 believes it is.  Never encountered that one before.

Mike.
(let Tom Hogarty know as well)

Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8636



WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2011, 07:30:11 PM »
ReplyReply

Norton is evil <g> Ignore and install.
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
wolfnowl
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5698



WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 10, 2011, 08:28:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Unfortunately, it won't let me.  It deletes the file automatically.  I'll have to find a way around it.

Mike.
Logged

If your mind is attuned to beauty, you find beauty in everything.
~ Jean Cooke ~


My Flickr site / Random Thoughts and Other Meanderings at M&M's Musings
wtlloyd
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 123


« Reply #4 on: March 10, 2011, 08:51:59 PM »
ReplyReply

Norton...... Roll Eyes
Logged
michael
Administrator
Sr. Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4783



« Reply #5 on: March 10, 2011, 08:52:58 PM »
ReplyReply

Windows  Angry
Logged
BFoto
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 240



WWW
« Reply #6 on: March 10, 2011, 09:24:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Windows  Angry

Michael, you didn't just...

Ditch norton and go with ESET Nod32. A world of difference and no affect on background CPU performance.
Logged

Schewe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5427


WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 10, 2011, 09:30:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Ditch norton and go with ESET Nod32. A world of difference and no affect on background CPU performance.

Actually, I think Michael ditched Windows...
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7790



WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 10, 2011, 10:55:11 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, it does require a certain level of sophistication to be able to use Windows effectively.  Wink

Rule number 1 is to uninstall Norton, using something like ccleaner to get rid of all its nasty hidden bits, and then use a better protection system (even Microsoft security Essentials is better than Norton these days).

Eric
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Steve Weldon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1445



WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 10, 2011, 10:59:45 PM »
ReplyReply

There is nothing wrong with Norton.. 360 V5 is the best all around protection you can get imo.

And if you read the prompts it will easily solve the install problem with LR.  You can tell it to restore and ignore any file that gives it trouble.  You've just gotta read the prompts..
Logged

----------------------------------------------
http://www.BangkokImages.com
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5548



WWW
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2011, 12:46:52 AM »
ReplyReply

Windows  Angry

What?! It is 21st century and there are still some using it!?
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Steve Weldon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1445



WWW
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2011, 02:51:48 AM »
ReplyReply

What?! It is 21st century and there are still some using it!?

Only those living above ground level..
Logged

----------------------------------------------
http://www.BangkokImages.com
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2534


« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2011, 03:01:41 AM »
ReplyReply

I can use it without resorting to wearing a hair shirt. Wink
Logged

deejjjaaaa
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 743


« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2011, 09:52:08 AM »
ReplyReply

360 V5 is the best all around protection you can get imo.
"Norton" line it is just a version for dumb consumers... what you really need to use from Symantec is its Symantec Endpoint Protection line.
Logged
Wil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2011, 09:54:46 AM »
ReplyReply

Win 7, 64: Norton

LR 3.4RC installed just fine without a hitch.

Good Luck!
Wil
Logged
Steve Weldon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1445



WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2011, 10:06:43 AM »
ReplyReply

"Norton" line it is just a version for dumb consumers... what you really need to use from Symantec is its Symantec Endpoint Protection line.
I reviewed it once.. it was aimed at other than home users and priced accordingly.  Nice software though.

Norton Internet Security and 360 are very effective and have scored at or near the top of most comparisons, while requiring very little intervention on the users part.  And at a price point (3 PC's for $59?) you can swallow.  And it does this with a minimum amount of system resources.  Over all, much improved over even 2-3 years ago.

And let's not pick on dumb consumers.  They're helping Apple make record profits..  Grin
Logged

----------------------------------------------
http://www.BangkokImages.com
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5548



WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2011, 10:31:24 AM »
ReplyReply

... And let's not pick on dumb consumers.  They're helping Apple make record profits..  Grin

A good one, Steve!

In defense of Apple customers, suffice to say they prefer to use their brains on things other than babysitting their pc (you know, frequent diaper changing, vaccinating, etc.)  Wink
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
Steve Weldon
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1445



WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2011, 10:51:21 AM »
ReplyReply

A good one, Steve!

In defense of Apple customers, suffice to say they prefer to use their brains on things other than babysitting their pc (you know, frequent diaper changing, vaccinating, etc.)  Wink

We do our best..  Roll Eyes

And yes, I do realize Apple customers have issues with multitasking..  Wink

In all seriousness I have recently decided it would behoove me to learn the Snow Dwarf OS.  So.. I set out to my friendly Apple store to score a licensed copy of Snow Dwarf for the purposes of building a Hackintosh.  The conversation was so funny I wrote it down, but suffice it to say I didn't get my copy.  They claim they don't sell the OS by itself.

Upping the ante I look into a small 13" (I wanted a 12" but they don't make them) Macbookpro.. and discovered Steve Job's thinks I don't need an i7 for such a small screen.  This surprised me as I greatly enjoy my 12" i7/8g RAM/SSD in my Lenovo x201s.. I find out to get the performance I desire, I'll have to lug around a laptop much bigger/heavier than I desire.  Once more I went home empty handed.

I figure there must be a secret suggestion box somewhere at Apple HQ so I can drop a note letting Mr. Job's know my requirements are right along the lines of the mainstream PC user. 
Logged

----------------------------------------------
http://www.BangkokImages.com
Alan Goldhammer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1606


WWW
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2011, 02:02:52 PM »
ReplyReply

Funny that all the Mac users end up paying almost twice as much for a computer that has essentially the same specifications in terms of power as a new Win7 machine.  I've been running Win7 every since it came out and it's been rock solid on all of the applications I run.  I do a fair amount of spreadsheet work and it's a joy.  I've had as many as six applications open and running at a single time (including LR) and no glitches.  You all can continue to enrich Steve Jobs or you can join the new wave to Win7 and buy a couple of lenses with the money you save.
Logged

JohnBrew
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 721


WWW
« Reply #19 on: March 11, 2011, 03:19:40 PM »
ReplyReply

Heck, Alan, I'm running Vista Ultimate 64 and it has been rock solid. Go figure after all the bad press.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad