Lightroom with new OS LION

[CatOne]

I've gotten numerous emails from X-Rite that they will be providing this update free of charge to registered (that's REGISTERED) owners of some devices, including the Eye 1 Display 2 (which I have).  They must have your serial # on file.

I remember mentioning to them about 6 months before Lion shipped that Rosetta wasn't a default in Snow Leopard.  Guess 2+ years later they got their hand forced ;-)

[StuartOnline]

I've gotten numerous emails from X-Rite that they will be providing this update free of charge to registered (that's REGISTERED) owners of some devices, including the Eye 1 Display 2 (which I have).  They must have your serial # on file.

I remember mentioning to them about 6 months before Lion shipped that Rosetta wasn't a default in Snow Leopard.  Guess 2+ years later they got their hand forced ;-)

I was not sure if I was registered or not since I purchased it about 16 months ago. So I just went and re-registered so I could get the update for the Eye 1 Display 2.
In the mean time I was able to use my older Huey Pro as that works with OS X Lion.

Stu

[schrodingerscat]

I've gotten numerous emails from X-Rite that they will be providing this update free of charge to registered (that's REGISTERED) owners of some devices, including the Eye 1 Display 2 (which I have).  They must have your serial # on file.

I remember mentioning to them about 6 months before Lion shipped that Rosetta wasn't a default in Snow Leopard.  Guess 2+ years later they got their hand forced ;-)

Thanks or that, I do hope they come through with something at least reasonable. Being able to run i1 without Rosetta in SL would be a plus as well. From what I gather from the emails I got from X-rite, they must be dealing with a lot of grumpy owners of legacy products these days.

[michaelstokes]

I recently upgraded my iMac to Lion and I am experiencing a problem printing to an Epson 2400. The colours look slightly off and there is a very distinct 'shadow'  appearing around the hairline in portraits but the same photo prints perfectly on my MacBook Pro running 10.6.  Has anyone encountered a similar problem?