Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 33 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: ITT: wow me with some of your non-professional work  (Read 111743 times)
MichaelEzra
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 659



WWW
« Reply #180 on: November 29, 2012, 06:52:50 AM »
ReplyReply

...due to stocking issues it became unavailable Tongue
Logged

NickCroken
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 118


« Reply #181 on: November 29, 2012, 01:30:10 PM »
ReplyReply

hahahaha, I'm not sure how I missed that.  The light looks almost too dynamic to be natural.  Love it!
Logged
skimasks
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


WWW
« Reply #182 on: November 30, 2012, 12:04:29 AM »
ReplyReply

I guess this is a weird post because it's not technically a photograph...
This was compiled for my personal portfolio using a combination of my Cambo WRS with a Phase One back, Nikon d7000, and the Nikon d800.

https://vimeo.com/54567777
Logged

Eric Kellerman
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



WWW
« Reply #183 on: November 30, 2012, 02:14:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Logged
Justinr
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1027


WWW
« Reply #184 on: November 30, 2012, 05:17:56 PM »
ReplyReply



Lovely shot and I do like the curves of the torso and breast but somehow the hand looks out of place, it doesn't seem to belong, dark, menacing and intrusive against the purity of the body. A forewarning of the ravages of age? Especially as it seems to beckon.
« Last Edit: December 01, 2012, 05:03:41 AM by Justinr » Logged

TMARK
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1843


« Reply #185 on: December 01, 2012, 06:20:47 AM »
ReplyReply



Fantastic. Without the hand it's pretty. With the hand it's really human.
Logged
Eric Kellerman
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



WWW
« Reply #186 on: December 01, 2012, 07:01:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you both for your comments. The hand is certainly intended to be the disruptive element in this photo, and I can see its function is open to interpretation. I'll just add that I try to eschew 'meaning' in my photos. Wink
Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4058



« Reply #187 on: December 01, 2012, 08:08:36 AM »
ReplyReply

I'll just add that I try to eschew 'meaning' in my photos. Wink

Sensible chap.

Jeremy
Logged
Eric Kellerman
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



WWW
« Reply #188 on: December 01, 2012, 11:32:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Sensible chap.

Jeremy

That sounds faintly patronising, though I'm sure it really isn't.
Logged
kikashi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4058



« Reply #189 on: December 01, 2012, 12:48:56 PM »
ReplyReply

That sounds faintly patronising, though I'm sure it really isn't.

Absolutely not.

Jeremy
Logged
chaosphere
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 52



WWW
« Reply #190 on: December 01, 2012, 01:15:37 PM »
ReplyReply

Hi mates !
My first "fashion" photography, please be kind  Grin



H3DII-39 - 100mm at f2.2 - 50 Iso
made with the available light

Great shot. I keep coming back and looking at this image. I love it! Perfect light, perfect style perfect location.  Do you mind me asking what you lit this with?
if i read the description properly he used an 'available light'. i have searched calumet/B&H for one of those but no luck  Cry
hehehe thanks Nick ! Mr Smith is right, it's not in the B&H catalog but it's cheaper than opening their website  Grin Grin
As I "only" was the light assistant for this shooting I had no transmitter for my Hasselblad to pop the flashes (the main photographer was my buddy Gilles Alonso -you can see his series with flash light on his website www.gillesalonso.com - ), so, while he was doing the coffee between two looks, I popped out my H3D out of my bag and made 2 photos only, including this one  Cheesy I'm very lucky to had this light at this moment.

If you are using Firefox you can right-click and see it bigger!
Logged

Matías Antoniassi
www.matantoniassi.com
FredBGG
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1651


« Reply #191 on: December 01, 2012, 07:24:46 PM »
ReplyReply



I like how "so much is wrong" with this picture, yet it is so damn good!

I like how you threw out the composition rule of thirds (along with all the others)..... yet the composition is
so descriptive and evocative.

The lighting.... the shadow on the right side of the body hides the line of her waist thickening her body..... however
her form is still beautiful and the way the light goes into dark both in the foreground and background adds all sorts of things.

I don't find the hand to be disruptive... to the contrary... it ads an uncanny emotion.
I like the way the light is very caressing and soft on the body yet harsher and detailed on the hand.

What I like most about the image is a certain "untidiness" that makes it both more photographic than painterly, but also gives it a candid
glance feel...... Reminds me of a glance at the body of one's female partner as one wakes up...

It's interesting that you did this quite deliberately Wink and it looks in a certain sense like you accidentely fired your camera off
as you woke up with your lady on the other side of the bed. Love it.
Logged
FredBGG
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1651


« Reply #192 on: December 01, 2012, 07:26:42 PM »
ReplyReply

Fantastic. Without the hand it's pretty. With the hand it's really human.

@ TMARK

Now that is the most efficient use of words I've seen in a long time.

+1
Logged
MichaelEzra
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 659



WWW
« Reply #193 on: December 01, 2012, 08:07:37 PM »
ReplyReply

Eric, this is a great image.

It recalled in memory this one I made back in 2000



Logged

Eric Kellerman
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



WWW
« Reply #194 on: December 02, 2012, 05:11:37 AM »
ReplyReply

Absolutely not.

Jeremy

I thought it wasn't, knowing you (a very little) from other posts!
Logged
Eric Kellerman
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89



WWW
« Reply #195 on: December 02, 2012, 05:16:25 AM »
ReplyReply

I really like it, Michael (and the rest of your work) ...
Logged
skimasks
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 75


WWW
« Reply #196 on: December 06, 2012, 01:38:07 AM »
ReplyReply

Just mounting some new snowboard bindings for this season.
Logged

chrismuc
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 79


« Reply #197 on: December 07, 2012, 10:59:39 PM »
ReplyReply

I want to share a picture by Contax 645 35 mm lens and Phase One P65+ back which shows the excellent high light and underexposure recovery capability of the Dalsa 60 MP sensor. That's miles ahead of my 5D2 files which blow out the lights much earlier and show more noise in the underexposed areas.
First file from raw, no PS, to show the dynamic range of the pic in full sunlight.
Second file I created in ACR a kind of HDR looking pic form the single raw.
Third a 100% crop from "HDR" file.
Btw: 1/15 second handheld no problem with the heavy cam and 35mm lens:-)
Chris
Logged
HarperPhotos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1249



WWW
« Reply #198 on: December 10, 2012, 02:29:22 PM »
ReplyReply

Hello,

Just having ago at reproducing the affect of manipulating a Polaroid X70 with a Nikon D800.

Cheers

Simon
Logged

Simon Harper
Harper Photographics Ltd
http://www.harperphoto.com
http://www.facebook.com/harper.photographics

Auckland, New Zealand
HarperPhotos
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1249



WWW
« Reply #199 on: December 12, 2012, 07:21:06 PM »
ReplyReply

Hello,

Just having ago at reproducing the affect of manipulating a Polaroid X70 with a Nikon D800.

Cheers

Simon
Logged

Simon Harper
Harper Photographics Ltd
http://www.harperphoto.com
http://www.facebook.com/harper.photographics

Auckland, New Zealand
Pages: « 1 ... 8 9 [10] 11 12 ... 33 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad