Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 2 [3]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: New Fuji X Pro 1 Lenses  (Read 11878 times)
fredjeang
Guest
« Reply #40 on: January 27, 2012, 07:58:46 AM »
ReplyReply








« Last Edit: January 27, 2012, 08:02:06 AM by fredjeang » Logged
KLaban
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1703



WWW
« Reply #41 on: January 27, 2012, 09:00:28 AM »
ReplyReply

...and yes, Fred, I prefer my current MINI Cooper to the original  Wink

EDIT

...but I'd prefer an original Fiat 500 to the current.
« Last Edit: January 27, 2012, 09:36:38 AM by KLaban » Logged

fredjeang
Guest
« Reply #42 on: January 27, 2012, 10:22:19 AM »
ReplyReply

So do I.

I would buy a remake Mini cooper but not the Fiat remake. Wink

Still waiting for a remake of a triumph (without roof)

Ps: have you seen the absolute horror they did with the CitroŽn DS remake ? A complete failure !

about cars and the thread:

Honestly guys,

Are you all going into nostalgic aberrations attack (to stay in photography nomenclature) with this Fuji as its main attractive ?

Marketing department product ? or a real 2012 tool ? Maybe bit of both. But, pfffff...we're still on the same design from the latest ice-age.



  
« Last Edit: January 27, 2012, 11:13:50 AM by fredjeang » Logged
AlfSollund
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 130


« Reply #43 on: January 27, 2012, 11:46:17 AM »
ReplyReply

Just a quick personal point about DoF.

I have a 5D and a 20D with the usual lenses including 50 and 85mm f1.4's and I also own a GF1 and a G1 with a small selection of lenses including a 25mm f0.95. Now when it comes to DoF I can get shallower DoF from my G1+25mm than I can get from my 5D plus a f1.4. 

Are you sure? I was under the impression that a 25 f/1.0 on a m43 would give the same DoF as a 50 f/2 (2 stops) on a FF. So a 50 f/1,4 on a FF would allow a shallower DoF.
Logged

-------
- If your're not telling a story with photo you're only adding noise -
http://alfsollund.com/
Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12213


« Reply #44 on: January 27, 2012, 01:24:30 PM »
ReplyReply

Are you sure? I was under the impression that a 25 f/1.0 on a m43 would give the same DoF as a 50 f/2 (2 stops) on a FF. So a 50 f/1,4 on a FF would allow a shallower DoF.





Why do I always read your stage name as Alfasud?

Rob C
Logged

fredjeang
Guest
« Reply #45 on: January 27, 2012, 02:12:08 PM »
ReplyReply





Why do I always read your stage name as Alfasud?

Rob C

 Grin So do I Rob !

I had an alfasud, the 1,5 Ti. I was racing with a friend who had a Ford XR3.

Result: on relatively straight roads, the XR3 always won. On curves, the Alfasud won.



Then I put myself in sport motorcycles.



« Last Edit: January 27, 2012, 02:14:54 PM by fredjeang » Logged
nightfire
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 90



« Reply #46 on: January 27, 2012, 03:01:03 PM »
ReplyReply

Are you all going into nostalgic aberrations attack (to stay in photography nomenclature) with this Fuji as its main attractive ?

Marketing department product ? or a real 2012 tool ? Maybe bit of both. But, pfffff...we're still on the same design from the latest ice-age.

Probably more of a marketing department product.

The technical department probably would have added a medium-format sensor to a Fuji GA645 Zi body, the same way Leica conceived their M9. That would have been an exciting tool, ice-age design or not  Wink

Logged
scooby70
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 230


« Reply #47 on: January 27, 2012, 03:50:43 PM »
ReplyReply

Are you sure? I was under the impression that a 25 f/1.0 on a m43 would give the same DoF as a 50 f/2 (2 stops) on a FF. So a 50 f/1,4 on a FF would allow a shallower DoF.

I think I'm sure  Grin At the same camera to subject distance the shots will look different as one lens is a 50mm and the other is 25mm so background items may very well look different but I'm pretty sure f0.95 does beat f1.4. One situation in which I can definitely get shallower DoF from my MFT and 25mm f0.95 is when using it as a sort of psudo macro lens as it'll focus a lot closer than a 50mm f1.4 will, so close in fact that f0.95 isn't really useable unless you're going for a very arty effect. f0.95 does come in very useful in lower available light as I can shoot at much lower ISO than I can with a f1.4.
Logged
Petrus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 539


« Reply #48 on: March 31, 2012, 12:47:44 PM »
ReplyReply

Given the smaller sensor, could they not have worked a little harder?




Work harder to make a camera which is too small to handle ergonomically and no space for all buttons and levers? Make smaller cameras when the human hands have evolved smaller (blueberry typing size?)
Logged
Petrus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 539


« Reply #49 on: March 31, 2012, 12:51:53 PM »
ReplyReply

I'll add that I have never seen a lens to resolve at full open f:1.4 as well as the new XF 35mm f:1.4. Tack sharp to the corners, and no color fringing at all.
Logged
Pages: « 1 2 [3]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad