Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Ken Rockwell  (Read 11720 times)
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2530


« Reply #40 on: February 25, 2012, 03:13:12 AM »
ReplyReply

I think Ken makes more sense than Lewis Carroll. Smiley Grin
Logged

Walter Schulz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


« Reply #41 on: February 25, 2012, 03:44:03 AM »
ReplyReply

I think Ken makes more sense than Lewis Carroll. Smiley Grin

Do a background check. You may be surprised how much of Charles Lutwidge Dogson's day job appears in Lewis Carroll's books.
http://www.maa.org/devlin/devlin_03_10.html for starters.

Ciao, Walter
Logged
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2530


« Reply #42 on: February 25, 2012, 03:59:29 AM »
ReplyReply

Life's too short. I mistakenly thought that this was a site for photography. Recently I have had my doubts.
Logged

Walter Schulz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


« Reply #43 on: February 25, 2012, 04:45:38 AM »
ReplyReply

Life's too short. I mistakenly thought that this was a site for photography. Recently I have had my doubts.

This very virtual place is called "The Coffee Corner" for a reason, I believe.
"A forum for open discussion of both photographic and non-photographic topics of a general nature."

===

He would joke with hyenas, returning their stare
With an impudent wag of the head:
And he once went a walk, paw-in-paw, with a bear,
“Just to keep up its spirits,” he said.

=== Lewis Carroll "The Hunting of The Snark"

So, come back to the table, please!

Ciao, Walter
« Last Edit: February 25, 2012, 04:47:15 AM by Walter Schulz » Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5536



WWW
« Reply #44 on: February 25, 2012, 05:48:57 AM »
ReplyReply

... The thread has finally reached the level of seriousness worthy of Ken Rockwell Wink

+1
Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
jeremypayne
Guest
« Reply #45 on: February 25, 2012, 06:54:59 AM »
ReplyReply

Life's too short. I mistakenly thought that this was a site for photography. Recently I have had my doubts.

Man ... what a broken record you've become!  Enough already ...

If the threads bore you ... why do you read them?
Logged
JBerardi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 136


« Reply #46 on: February 25, 2012, 07:20:07 AM »
ReplyReply

Life's too short. I mistakenly thought that this was a site for photography. Recently I have had my doubts.

I mean, it's basically the biggest gearhead site out there. There's more discussion of actual photography at DPreview than his site. But, and here's the key part, he pulls the classic trick of preemptively accusing everyone else of being guilty of his own worst crimes. Every photo on his site is like, "hey, look how saturated and sharp this fire hydrant is on my million dollar camera!", and then he turns around and says stuff about how all anyone needs is a Canon Powershot and the rest of the photo world is obsessed with gear and they should be taking art classes and learning technique and color theory, etc. Oh, and by the way, look how friggin' saturated (and sharp!) this stop sign is with his new M9 and Leica Ultracrazylux f 0.3 $28,000 lens is! And while he insists no one should be buying such frivolities, he's kind enough to provide (paid) B&H, Adorama and Amazon links to them. So basically, he does one thing, tells a story about what he's doing that's completely contrary to that, and makes buck off of it every step of the way.

What I'm saying is, he really belongs in politics.
Logged
jalcocer
Guest
« Reply #47 on: February 25, 2012, 07:25:33 AM »
ReplyReply

What I'm saying is, he really belongs in politics.

Ken for president!  Wink
Logged
Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7790



WWW
« Reply #48 on: February 25, 2012, 07:56:46 AM »
ReplyReply

Life's too short. I mistakenly thought that this was a site for photography. Recently I have had my doubts.
The Reverend Charles Lutwidge Dodgson was indeed a photographer, and quite a good one. Though perhaps you were concerned about all this talk of Ken Rockwell. I think the jury is still out on whether he is a photographer.  Wink

Eric
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
stamper
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 2530


« Reply #49 on: February 25, 2012, 09:59:34 AM »
ReplyReply

Man ... what a broken record you've become!  Enough already ...

If the threads bore you ... why do you read them?


I am not bored just prefer photographic subjects, Lewis Carrol wasn't into photography? Jeremy you are well named. Smiley Grin
Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12215


« Reply #50 on: February 25, 2012, 10:13:26 AM »
ReplyReply

+1




Slobodan, very subtle. Surreal, even...

;-)

Rob C
Logged

Scott O.
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 312


WWW
« Reply #51 on: February 28, 2012, 12:41:10 AM »
ReplyReply

If it is not too late to make a New Year's resolution, I promise to never mention his name again on any and all forums I participate in, either now or in the future! Although I am happy that he has decreed that the 28-300 (which I have) will be the best lens for my expected D800!  Grin
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


There is no rule! No - wait ...


« Reply #52 on: February 28, 2012, 02:17:21 AM »
ReplyReply

If it is not too late to make a New Year's resolution, I promise to never mention his name again on any and all forums I participate in, either now or in the future! Although I am happy that he has decreed that the 28-300 (which I have) will be the best lens for my expected D800!  Grin

This lens is too limited.
You should get the infamous 15-500 f 0.95 Spamalux with the 1.4 extender.
This is simply the best lens of the world and you'll hardly ever need anything additional.
It is razor sharp in my imagination and saves me a lot of money because I only need one lens.
Did I mention its macro function?
You can put a bee on its front lens and get the bees feet sharp like a Japanese knife.
I believe it is sold with a trolley for transportation and an extra pack of painkillers.
 Tongue

Plug: If you want to support my ever increasing madness I suggest you write a lot of even crazier answers to this rubbish, otherwise happily ignore it.
« Last Edit: February 28, 2012, 02:26:51 AM by Christoph C. Feldhaim » Logged

jalcocer
Guest
« Reply #53 on: February 28, 2012, 07:26:13 AM »
ReplyReply

This lens is too limited.
You should get the infamous 15-500 f 0.95 Spamalux with the 1.4 extender.
This is simply the best lens of the world and you'll hardly ever need anything additional.
It is razor sharp in my imagination and saves me a lot of money because I only need one lens.
Did I mention its macro function?
You can put a bee on its front lens and get the bees feet sharp like a Japanese knife.
I believe it is sold with a trolley for transportation and an extra pack of painkillers.
 Tongue

Plug: If you want to support my ever increasing madness I suggest you write a lot of even crazier answers to this rubbish, otherwise happily ignore it.

You forgot the lens hood! Smiley
Logged
Christoph C. Feldhaim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


There is no rule! No - wait ...


« Reply #54 on: February 28, 2012, 08:08:56 AM »
ReplyReply

You forgot the lens hood! Smiley

Right.
I forgot.
The lens hood.
The lens hood is a carbon nanotube coated foldable carbon fibre cloth with carbon fibre rods which you can disassemble in astonishing 42 microseconds.
Actually you can also use it as a tent  if you have the accessory piece of roof cloth.

Cheers
~Chris
Logged

Eric Myrvaagnes
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7790



WWW
« Reply #55 on: February 28, 2012, 08:53:28 AM »
ReplyReply

This lens is too limited.
You should get the infamous 15-500 f 0.95 Spamalux with the 1.4 extender.
This is simply the best lens of the world and you'll hardly ever need anything additional.
It is razor sharp in my imagination and saves me a lot of money because I only need one lens.
Did I mention its macro function?
You can put a bee on its front lens and get the bees feet sharp like a Japanese knife.
I believe it is sold with a trolley for transportation and an extra pack of painkillers.
 Tongue

Plug: If you want to support my ever increasing madness I suggest you write a lot of even crazier answers to this rubbish, otherwise happily ignore it.
No, Christoph! That's the wrong extender! I don't know where you got the idea that a stodgy old 1.4 would do the job in the 21st century.

What you need is the state-of-the-art +/-5.6x Spamtastic extender (with both a red ring and a gold ring around it). Personally autographed by K*n R*ckw*ll for only $743,591 additional.   Cool
Logged

-Eric Myrvaagnes

http://myrvaagnes.com  Visit my website. New images each season.
Bryan Conner
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 514


WWW
« Reply #56 on: February 28, 2012, 08:54:58 AM »
ReplyReply

Right.
I forgot.
The lens hood.
The lens hood is a carbon nanotube coated foldable carbon fibre cloth with carbon fibre rods which you can disassemble in astonishing 42 microseconds.
Actually you can also use it as a tent  if you have the accessory piece of roof cloth.

Cheers
~Chris

you should buy the latest model, I have the MKII version that came with the Carbon Fiber Accessory Cone to be used for safe Lunar Orbit re-entry.
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


There is no rule! No - wait ...


« Reply #57 on: February 28, 2012, 09:13:06 AM »
ReplyReply

Disclaimer:
My tests are based on the (obviously now outdated) MK I version and first extender which was available at that time. Seems I'm always lagging behind a bit.

What I could find out by searching secret sources in the net in the meantime is, that the MK III will get announced soonish and be shown at the upcoming photokina. It contains a new wobbly lens which is a Bionics design after the eye of the Jabberwock as well as a flexible tube material out of the skin of the beast. The extender will be replaced by a cograil stretcher with a wheel to physically extend the whole lens, so you won't need an additional extender anymore if you have the cograil to stretch the whole MK III design. The cograil is not meant to be used with the MK II or MK I version, because of their non-stretchable material. The special signed editions are not yet announced. What is also not yet clear is, if there will also be a compressor to extend further into the wide angle range or even negative focal lengths by everting the lens ...




Logged

Rob C
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12215


« Reply #58 on: February 28, 2012, 11:58:30 AM »
ReplyReply

Disclaimer:
My tests are based on the (obviously now outdated) MK I version and first extender which was available at that time. Seems I'm always lagging behind a bit.

 What is also not yet clear is, if there will also be a compressor to extend further into the wide angle range or even negative focal lengths by everting the lens ...




Man, you're lagging more than you thought: you forgot to mention the shark's-penis-skin carrying bag for the limited extender. It's a dual-purpose model and saves you buying an underwater housing. It obviates the need for a polarizer.

Rob C
Logged

Christoph C. Feldhaim
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


There is no rule! No - wait ...


« Reply #59 on: February 28, 2012, 12:05:42 PM »
ReplyReply

Rob - now I believe you're kidding!!!
Sharks are fish and not whales and thus don't have a penis.
  Tongue

EDIT: Did you mean that thing on their rear side which is standing up all the time ? Its called fin, not penis ....
« Last Edit: February 28, 2012, 12:09:04 PM by Christoph C. Feldhaim » Logged

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad