Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: [1]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Which 70-300mm - 3x versions ?  (Read 669 times)
FrankG
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« on: March 09, 2012, 11:26:18 AM »
ReplyReply

70-300mm / 4-5.6 IS
70-300mm / 4-5.6 IS L
70-300mm / 4-5.6 IS DO (the compact physical design)

Can anyone comment on any compelling reasons to choose one over the others?
Obviously the L version is almost 3x the price of the regular. Are the pictures much better?
The DO version is nice & small (a great advantage when walking the city) but doesn't cost much less than the L.
I'm open to finding used gear.

Mainly I'll be using it either for landscapes where I'll stop down to f11 more or less.
AND, more frequently, I'll be using it for city scenes with tight 'graphic' compositions ala Jay Maisel (who I understand uses the Nikon versions 70-300mm & 28-300mm VR, 4.5-5.6 & 3.5-5.6 respectively).
I'd be much wider open & mostly hand held (e.g. f4 or 5.6) in this scenario.

I love great quality (5D2) and this would be my first zoom. I only have primes.

Thanks
Frank
« Last Edit: March 09, 2012, 11:30:40 AM by FrankG » Logged
David Sutton
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 874


WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2012, 03:13:15 PM »
ReplyReply

Hello Frank.
I haven't tried the DO version but have used the other two on a 5D2. I think it depends a bit on your output. If you are shooting for the web then any one of the three will do a fine job. If you are printing and need resolution then the L version is much sharper and the difference is obvious. As good as the 70-200L.  It is also much faster to focus, almost instantaneous in good light. And the IS really is a step above the earlier lens.
David
Logged

FrankG
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 194


« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2012, 04:42:21 PM »
ReplyReply

Yes, to be able to make decent size prints - at last 16 in x...
The web is a byproduct.
Thanks for the recommendation to consider the L.
Logged
Slobodan Blagojevic
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Posts: 5521



WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2012, 05:36:33 PM »
ReplyReply

You might want to check two reviews for the L lens:

The legendary Eric Meola's Review of 70-300L

Canon Rumors Review of 70-300L

I used the other two. Both are excellent optically. I returned the DO one for poor (for me) ergonomics (zoom ring too tight and way too close to camera body for comfortable zooming). If I would be buying today, I would probably go for the L version.

Logged

Slobodan

Flickr
500px
sbay
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 89


WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2012, 08:19:00 PM »
ReplyReply


Obviously the L version is almost 3x the price of the regular. Are the pictures much better?


Yes. The L version is far far better than the non-L version (I haven't used the DO). In fact, my 70-300L was better than my 70-200 f/4 IS L on full frame.

Stephen
Logged

Pages: [1]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad