Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2]   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: i1 Display 2  (Read 6925 times)
Czornyj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1419



WWW
« Reply #20 on: March 21, 2012, 02:20:20 PM »
ReplyReply

Don’t waste your time with the ColorMunki Display, it is the same hardware as the Pro with crippled software.

...not to mention the slower speed, lack of thermal stabilization, tripod mount, and 3rd party software support (with the exception of ArgyllCMS).
Logged

Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1801



WWW
« Reply #21 on: March 21, 2012, 02:41:49 PM »
ReplyReply

How often do you use the tripod mount?

How often have you seen a disparity caused by the lack thermal stabilization?

How often do you think most photographers use 3rd party color management software?

yes all of those things can be very important - well maybe not the tripod mount  - but it depends on what the user does.

it is easy to accept a deeper more complex feature set as adding value, but only if you actually use those features.

Andrew's points "having full control over luminance, white points  and contrast ratio"  are the only ones presented so far that make  a valid case against the CM Display for most reasonably critical photographers. You can always add more eggs and sugar to a pudding but that won't always make it taste better. 

Let's not forget that  Lupin will be using an Eizo CG241 so presumably he will be using Eizo's Color Navigator program instead of either the i1 Profiler or the ColorMunki software.
Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9098



WWW
« Reply #22 on: March 21, 2012, 02:45:29 PM »
ReplyReply

How often do you use the tripod mount?

Only when profiling a projector.

Quote
How often do you think most photographers use 3rd party color management software?

Depends on their needs and when the host software doesn’t meet their needs. Hence my advise about skipping the crippled software...

Quote
Let's not forget that  Lupin will be using an Eizo CG241 so presumably he will be using Eizo's Color Navigator program instead of either the i1 Profiler or the ColorMunki software.

And ColorMunki Display is supported?
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
Czornyj
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1419



WWW
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2012, 02:54:40 PM »
ReplyReply

And ColorMunki Display is supported?
Of course not.
Logged

Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1801



WWW
« Reply #24 on: March 21, 2012, 02:56:50 PM »
ReplyReply

"And ColorMunki Display is supported?"

Good call on that Andrew! I thought it now did but am wrong according to Eizo @ http://www.eizo.com/global/products/coloredge/cn/index.html  : "ColorMunki Display is not supported."

I withdraw my recommendation of the ColorMunki Display to Lupin.

Go with the Xrite i1 Display Pro
Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1801



WWW
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2012, 02:59:37 PM »
ReplyReply

"And ColorMunki Display is supported?"

Good call on that Andrew! I thought it now did but am wrong according to Eizo @ http://www.eizo.com/global/products/coloredge/cn/index.html  : "ColorMunki Display is not supported."

I withdraw my recommendation of the ColorMunki Display to Lupin.

Go with the Xrite i1 Display Pro
A complete list of currently compatible measurement devices and limitations.
« Last Edit: March 21, 2012, 03:01:14 PM by Ellis Vener » Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #26 on: May 16, 2012, 12:02:20 PM »
ReplyReply

I still haven't decided which to go for.  Huh

I'm thinking of buying a printer fairly soon so wonder if the Color Munki Photo is the best bet. Does anyone have any thoughts on this device?

Logged
eronald
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4033



« Reply #27 on: May 16, 2012, 12:48:04 PM »
ReplyReply

I still haven't decided which to go for.  Huh

I'm thinking of buying a printer fairly soon so wonder if the Color Munki Photo is the best bet. Does anyone have any thoughts on this device?


I would go for it. Never heard anyone say anything bad about it Smiley
If you want to be more serious, you could go straight for i1Pro2 Basic, or maybe get an old i1Pro off ebay.

Edmund
Logged
Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1801



WWW
« Reply #28 on: May 16, 2012, 01:00:49 PM »
ReplyReply

If you have the money and will be printing enough to justify the expense,  the new i1 Pro Photo 2  set up is as good as it gets. If you'll really be using a lot of different papers and constantly profiling, you'll probably want to add the i1iO table to automate the process.

If you will be printing mostly as an extension of your hobby or for the occassional portfolio or exhibition, the  ColorMunki Photo works very well.
Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #29 on: May 16, 2012, 01:13:36 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks Edmund & Ellis.

The i1 Pro Photo would be nice but it's $1700 new over here (UK)  Shocked. The Color Munki Photo is around $450 - have both of you tried it?
Logged
digitaldog
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9098



WWW
« Reply #30 on: May 16, 2012, 01:18:53 PM »
ReplyReply

The i1 Pro Photo would be nice but it's $1700 new over here (UK)  Shocked. The Color Munki Photo is around $450 - have both of you tried it?

Yes and they are apples and oranges in terms of functionality, options for profile creation and so forth. Now the Munki is a fine product. If that is your price point, go for it. The difference in price you quote is pretty significant.
Logged

Andrew Rodney
Author “Color Management for Photographers”
http://digitaldog.net/
Ellis Vener
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1801



WWW
« Reply #31 on: May 16, 2012, 01:34:18 PM »
ReplyReply

I agree with Andrew Rodney.  I have not worked with the i1 Pro Photo 2 kit but am using the one that came out lasst fall and I use ColorMunki Photo as well.
Logged

Ellis Vener
http://www.ellisvener.com
Creating photographs for advertising, corporate and industrial clients since 1984.
eronald
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4033



« Reply #32 on: May 16, 2012, 02:34:32 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks Edmund & Ellis.

The i1 Pro Photo would be nice but it's $1700 new over here (UK)  Shocked. The Color Munki Photo is around $450 - have both of you tried it?

I have tried everything Smiley
The CM is a universal instrument, and I would recommend it if you think you can amortize it on a couple of generations of equipment.

Edmund
Logged
Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #33 on: May 16, 2012, 07:14:44 PM »
ReplyReply

Ed and Ellis - sadly, the i1 Pro Photo is way too expensive for me, so my two main options seem to be these:

   a) Purchase the i1 Display Pro and use it now for calibrating my CG241W - then buy a second device for printer profiling after I've
       actually bought the printer.

   b) Purchase the Color Munki Photo and use it for the CG241W now and the printer later.

In the long run, option a) will probably cost a lot more more than option b) so the Color Munki Pro seems the wisest choice (even though the i1 Display Pro is newer technology). Does my logic sound sensible to you?



PS. I forgot to mention - there are one or two poor reviews of the Color Munki Photo on Amazon. I'm not sure if they're valid criticisms though - http://www.amazon.co.uk/product-reviews/B00169N0BK/ref=dp_top_cm_cr_acr_txt?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1




« Last Edit: May 16, 2012, 07:33:44 PM by Lupin » Logged
Scott Martin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1311


WWW
« Reply #34 on: May 16, 2012, 08:29:14 PM »
ReplyReply

Ed and Ellis - sadly, the i1 Pro Photo is way too expensive for me, so my two main options seem to be these:

   a) Purchase the i1 Display Pro and use it now for calibrating my CG241W - then buy a second device for printer profiling after I've actually bought the printer.
   b) Purchase the Color Munki Photo and use it for the CG241W now and the printer later.

Or c) Get an i1DisplayPro an maintain excellent display calibration and employ a remote profiling service for occasional top-notch printer profiles when you need them.
Logged

Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2012, 06:13:43 AM »
ReplyReply

Or c) Get an i1DisplayPro an maintain excellent display calibration and employ a remote profiling service for occasional top-notch printer profiles when you need them.

Yes, I'd thought about that Scott. It's a good option if only a few printer profiles are needed - but what if more are needed long-term?

The difference in price between the Color Munki Photo and the i1 Display Pro is approx £110 (GBP). Remote profiling costs around £13 per profile - so I could get 8 profiles before the cost of option c) overtakes option b). Would that be enough long-term?
« Last Edit: May 17, 2012, 06:15:45 AM by Lupin » Logged
Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2012, 06:24:26 AM »
ReplyReply

PS. £13 is the cheapest I can find, it can be up to £18.

http://www.nativedigital.com/products/Custom-ICC-Printer-Profile.html
Logged
Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #37 on: May 19, 2012, 07:49:15 AM »
ReplyReply


The CM is a universal instrument, and I would recommend it if you think you can amortize it on a couple of generations of equipment.

I took the plunge and purchased the CM Photo yesterday. I'm not sure whether to use the CM software or Eizo's Color Navigator - the latter uses the monitor's LUT whereas the CM software uses the graphics card (I think).
Logged
Scott Martin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1311


WWW
« Reply #38 on: May 20, 2012, 10:25:15 AM »
ReplyReply

The ColorMunki really is a good value. It uses the same i1Prism engine that powers i1Profiler (which evolved from Monaco Profiler) and the printer profiles have the same great Relative and Absolute Colorimetric rendering. i1Profiler adds the ability to tweak the Perceptual rendering which can really help final print results if you use that intent. The Munki only works with Munki software and the device won't be supported in i1Profiler, ColorPort, RIPs or other Pro software solutions. So it's a great value with some notable limitations.
Logged

Lupin
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 60


« Reply #39 on: May 20, 2012, 04:42:08 PM »
ReplyReply

Thanks for that info Scott. Have you got any tips for getting the best out of it?

I've only tried the Munki software so far and the CG241 profile was quite a way off. I've yet to try Color Navigator.

Btw, Eizo say the CM Photo is compatible Color Navigator (bottom of this page http://www.eizo.com/global/products/coloredge/cn/index.html) but it seems that X-Rite's software has to be stopped first in Windows/Services (see http://support.colourconfidence.com/index.php?_m=knowledgebase&_a=viewarticle&kbarticleid=194&nav=0,29).

Logged
Pages: « 1 [2]   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad