Ad
Ad
Ad
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »   Bottom of Page
Print
Author Topic: Lightroom 4 is slow but fantastic  (Read 13912 times)
Rhossydd
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1965


WWW
« Reply #20 on: March 19, 2012, 03:13:18 PM »
ReplyReply

I find it slower, too, in terms of my use. The new sliders are less intuitive that the old one.
I think practice and experience will resolve that.
I'm finding it easy enough to understand the new controls, but the lack of responsiveness hugely hinders the learning process.
Over the weekend I was able to steadily count to twelve(about 9 seconds) before the screen updated on one adjustment. Bizarrely other sessions have been better, although never good. I don't know what's causing the slow downs, but so far it isn't particularly predictable.
Logged
nemophoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 507



WWW
« Reply #21 on: March 20, 2012, 11:46:10 AM »
ReplyReply

Nope...Highlights can not really clip-it rolls off at the extremes, Whites can clip that's what Whites is intended for. Whites has no highlight recovery built in while Highlights does. Yes, things can get complicated because now all the Basic sliders start at zero and allow plus or minus adjustments. That aspect is what is confusing a lot of people. Once you get past it, PV 2012 is much better (although different) than PV 2010.

Thanks for the clarification, Jeff. So essentially, mechanically speaking, White are the rough equivalent of Brightness, whereas Highlights are sort of Recovery, but with the added aspect of brightening the highlights? So, therefore Shadows are roughly equivalent to Fill? Black remains basically the same?
Logged

nemophoto
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 507



WWW
« Reply #22 on: March 20, 2012, 11:49:03 AM »
ReplyReply

... but the lack of responsiveness hugely hinders the learning process. Over the weekend I was able to steadily count to twelve(about 9 seconds) before the screen updated on one adjustment.

I totally agree with you. LR3, while it could bog down somewhat, was generally responsive. Now to see the effect of something, I have to sit and wait to see if I did enough, or perhaps too much of whatever.
Logged

WPalank
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 28



WWW
« Reply #23 on: March 21, 2012, 11:51:50 PM »
ReplyReply

Nope...Highlights can not really clip-it rolls off at the extremes, Whites can clip that's what Whites is intended for. Whites has no highlight recovery built in while Highlights does. Yes, things can get complicated because now all the Basic sliders start at zero and allow plus or minus adjustments. That aspect is what is confusing a lot of people. Once you get past it, PV 2012 is much better (although different) than PV 2010.

Jeff,
What would we do without you? Seriously! I can't say enough good things about yours and Michael's C to P. Now I have to download the LR4 tutorials. Not so much the cost as the time to ingest and put into use your perspective on a totally revamped Application. Smiley
Logged

aduke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 365


« Reply #24 on: March 22, 2012, 02:09:57 AM »
ReplyReply

Jeff,
What would we do without you? Seriously!

+1

Your work in the LR4 tutorial and many, many replies in the last few weeks have been invaluable.

Thank you for sharing your knowledge as well as your position of the Mr. X situation.

Alan
Logged
Schewe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5499


WWW
« Reply #25 on: March 22, 2012, 03:27:25 AM »
ReplyReply

Thank you for sharing your knowledge as well as your position of the Mr. X situation.

You are welcome...thanks for the kind words. Useful to get support....
Logged
CASpyr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 33


« Reply #26 on: March 22, 2012, 04:36:36 AM »
ReplyReply

... So essentially, mechanically speaking, White are the rough equivalent of Brightness

Definitely no. Brightness in pre-PV 2012 adjusted the midtones and left black and white point / clipping more or less alone. Whites in PV2012 affects a very narrow range at the upper end of the histogram, as you can easily see when you move the slider back and forth.

Personally, I found it more productive not trying to draw analogies between the old and new controls but to clear the plate and learn again. The new stuff works quite differently and thinking in the old categories holds you back in harnessing the full (and fantastic!) potential of PV2012. YMMV, of course...
Logged

----------------
Christian Spyr
John R Smith
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1357


Still crazy, after all these years


« Reply #27 on: March 23, 2012, 06:01:30 AM »
ReplyReply

Well, I downloaded the trial version of LR4 and I have been working with it for a week, on and off. I have to say that I can see the intended logic of the new PV 2012, but that in practice I am not terribly comfortable with the Basic Panel controls. From the little bit of experimenting I have done, I think that you might be rather more impressed if you were working in colour. However, as I work solely in B/W I am only really concerned with luminance. The thing I really, really miss is the Brightness control. I relied on this mid-tone gamma shift in LR3 enormously, both for global editing and on a grad or brush. Exposure in LR4 is no substitute - I just can't control it so finely, and I can't target it in quite the same way.

However, where LR4 is amazing is in its highlight recovery. With my Hass 3FR files I would reckon it is worth between 1/2 to 1 stop (EV), at least. Which really is food for thought with landscape work, and skies in particular. Now what would have been great would have been LR4 highlights and LR3 controls . . . just kidding, Jeff.

John
« Last Edit: March 23, 2012, 04:09:22 PM by John R Smith » Logged

Hasselblad 500 C/M, SWC and CFV-39 DB
and a case full of (very old) lenses and other bits
Jim Pascoe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 826


WWW
« Reply #28 on: March 23, 2012, 02:48:24 PM »
ReplyReply

I have just downloaded and installed LR 4, after having spent a couple of evenings watching some of the great new LL tutorials from Michael and Jeff.  While updating my old catalogue my wife bought me in a nice cold beer.  Now it could be the beer, but I could swear that on the images that have already been adjusted I still have the old recovery and fill light tools, where as with an image that has not yet been edited the new tools appear.  Am I hallucinating?

Jim
Logged
Walter Schulz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 105


« Reply #29 on: March 23, 2012, 02:52:04 PM »
ReplyReply

Take a look at the process version. I suppose you are using PV 2010 for those images.
You may want to read some of the discussions about transfer issues before stepping up to PV 2012.

Ciao, Walter
Logged
aduke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 365


« Reply #30 on: March 23, 2012, 04:01:44 PM »
ReplyReply

I have just downloaded and installed LR 4, after having spent a couple of evenings watching some of the great new LL tutorials from Michael and Jeff.  While updating my old catalogue my wife bought me in a nice cold beer.  Now it could be the beer, but I could swear that on the images that have already been adjusted I still have the old recovery and fill light tools, where as with an image that has not yet been edited the new tools appear.  Am I hallucinating?

Jim

You are not seeing things. Walter has it right, its the process version. The images that had been processed in PV2010 or before, remain processed in that version. The images not previously processed, even those imported by LR3, will come in in PV2012, and you will see the new controls.

Alan
Logged
Jim Pascoe
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 826


WWW
« Reply #31 on: March 24, 2012, 08:46:58 AM »
ReplyReply

I imagined it might be something like that, but it is pretty cool that the software has this facility built into it.

Jim
Logged
Petrus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 531


« Reply #32 on: March 29, 2012, 11:47:46 PM »
ReplyReply

You are not seeing things. Walter has it right, its the process version. The images that had been processed in PV2010 or before, remain processed in that version. The images not previously processed, even those imported by LR3, will come in in PV2012, and you will see the new controls.

Alan

Newbie here... I am just starting to use LR4, which I mostly bought for Fujifilm X-Pro1 (but not supported yet...). I imported a couple of fresh 5DII RAW files into it and to my surprise the sliders were the same as in Bridge (CS5); recovery & fill etc, not the extremely useful white, highlight etc I had seen when adjusting some older JPEGs for practice. Why is this?
Logged
Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2136


« Reply #33 on: March 30, 2012, 12:10:59 AM »
ReplyReply

It is likely these images were manipulated in Lr3. something and hence with process 2010.
Lr4 uses process 2012 but will change sliders in devlop to reflect process 2010 if given a previously manipulated image.

Check to see which process is being used.
One can easily change the process to process 2012 and the new sliders and controls will appear.

Let us know what happens.

Regards

Tony Jay
Logged
aduke
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 365


« Reply #34 on: March 30, 2012, 12:13:19 AM »
ReplyReply

Check your process version, it is not Camera Calibration section at the right side of the develop module screen. If its 2012, I dunnojavascript:void(0);, if its 2010, convert the image to 2012. There is a control at the bottom right of the image when in the develop module.

Alan
Logged
Tony Jay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2136


« Reply #35 on: March 30, 2012, 12:37:50 AM »
ReplyReply

The LR update promises to fix many of the speed issues currently being experienced.
Lets see what happens.

Regards

Tony Jay
Logged
Peter S
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 38


« Reply #36 on: April 02, 2012, 09:30:24 AM »
ReplyReply

Nope...Highlights can not really clip-it rolls off at the extremes, Whites can clip that's what Whites is intended for. Whites has no highlight recovery built in while Highlights does. Yes, things can get complicated because now all the Basic sliders start at zero and allow plus or minus adjustments. That aspect is what is confusing a lot of people. Once you get past it, PV 2012 is much better (although different) than PV 2010.

I am sorry but I do not understand this.  Can someone put me straight please?  If I have an image that has been over exposed the Highlights slider seems to enable me to recover the blown highlights but the Whites slider does not.  How does this tie up with the statement "Highlights can not really clip"?
Logged
Rand47
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 568


« Reply #37 on: April 02, 2012, 09:58:44 AM »
ReplyReply

What Jeff has said, I think, is that the "highlights slider" cannot cause clipping no matter how much you push it up, but that the "whites slider" can cause highlights to clip if you push it too far.

For a demo shoot something white then use each slider separately w/ the clipping indicator turned on.  It will become self evident.  

My current understanding is that the whites slider is essentially a "white end-point setting tool" and that the highlights slider is essentially a "highlights detail and recovery tool."   If you don't have the LULA new LR4 tutorials, they really help. The basic dev segment alone is worth the price of admission!
« Last Edit: April 02, 2012, 10:08:14 AM by Rand47 » Logged
Peter S
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 38


« Reply #38 on: April 02, 2012, 11:47:58 AM »
ReplyReply

Oh I see, well I think I do.

I had the LuLa LR3 tutorials and got the LR4 versions as soon as they started coming out.  I have found them excellent but I have still been struggling getting things right in the development module. It's coming - slowly.
Logged
JimAscher
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 339



WWW
« Reply #39 on: April 04, 2012, 11:46:45 AM »
ReplyReply

... The thing I really, really miss is the Brightness control....
John

This alone, I regret, will serve to make the decision for me not to upgrade.  I rely on the Brightness control as a (very) simplified mechanism for preparing black-and-white photos which I have edited (via LR3, PS and SEP2) for printing, so they don't turn out too dark in the actual printing process.  I've labored much in the past to get my monitor image to coincide with the print, to no avail. Use of the Brightness control is by far the easiest and most exact way for me to proceed.  Shame, because Lightroom 4 does appear to be otherwise an improvement over Lightroom 3.   
Logged

Jim Ascher

See my new SmugMug site:
http://jimascherphotos.smugmug.com/
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »   Top of Page
Print
Jump to:  

Ad
Ad
Ad